deterministic OCaml engine to compute and validate liturgical calendars for multiple rites, template-driven output to year 9999 https://git.labunix.xyz/colitur.git/atom?h=v0.1.0 2026-08-14T22:16:35Z 2026-08-14T22:16:35Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-14T22:16:35Z urn:sha1:124d7e2261c721c4a49f7203efc276088c7cb217 Liturgical_day.citations has read "always empty until Plan 4" since Plan 3; it is now filled. Rite.t gains a readings function, rite-supplied for the same reason transfer_target is: what a day with no proper falls back to is a rubric, not a universal. Calendar calls it and passes its own temporal function as the callback the rite needs to reach another date. Steps 1 and 2 only: the observed celebration's own proper, else the day's own temporal slug. Nothing encodes "Lent has daily propers" -- the presence of an entry is the discriminator. 2026-08-13T19:18:58Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-13T19:18:58Z urn:sha1:72b19098905cd609d87783f6e68311de4f1b61a0 Five follow-ups from the fix-round re-review, none touching a computed result. M20's note had said "moderate-high, not certain" with a specific revisit trigger attached. The fix round raised the label to "near-certain" and deleted the trigger in the same edit. Upgrading a confidence while removing the condition that would lower it again is the one move this record must not make, so the trigger is restored alongside the higher label: no primary text anywhere names the Major Litanies in a Mass-orations-count worked example, only the general II-class-Sunday rule twice over. RG 434(b) closes the Office-shaped doubt and nothing further. "WORD-IDENTICAL" overstated the relation between RG 111(b) and n. 434(b). Only the trailing "quae tamen omittitur si commemoratio privilegiata facienda sit" is verbatim in both; the openings differ, n. 434(b) recasting the rule into the orations register. The claim was self-refuting -- both texts are quoted adjacent to it -- and the argument never depended on it. Now "identical in its operative clause". And n. 434 is not "a different part of the same document": the running heads put RG 111 under Rubricae generales and n. 434 under Rubricae generales Missalis Romani, two distinct corpora bound in one volume, which is the entire force of the corroboration. The code comment had understated its own point. Also corrects the register's LT line range for n. 434(b) (3574-3576, not 3564-3570; the (b) clause is not in the cited range), and records in calendar.ml the diagnostic that channel (3) trades away: a rite whose transfer_target names a date its own disposition omits used to raise a loud, mislabelled Validate failure and is now silent at the origin. The kernel cannot distinguish that from a deliberate omission without rite knowledge it must not have, so accepting it is right -- but the signal is gone, and that should be written down rather than discovered later. 2026-08-13T18:55:28Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-13T18:55:28Z urn:sha1:10f0e964ceb2999b330ca4b3c6545e24eeb71f6c The prior fix (settled_at) recognised two settlement channels for a transferred candidate at its target -- winning outright (observed) or surviving as a commemoration -- but missed a third: reaching the target and then being CAPPED OUT there, by admit's own RG-111-style admission count limit or by disposition's own Omit. That candidate lands in the target's own omitted list, genuinely settled and accurately labelled, but settled_at did not check that list, so the origin reported it as unresolved under the same wrong, hardcoded unconverged_reason -- the exact original bug, one level further out. Unreachable on shipped EF data (the Major Litanies are the only privileged Commemoration_only candidate real data carries, and no second one can ever share Easter+2), but reachable by construction: a second privileged Commemoration_only entry on the Litanies' own transfer target that outranks it in admit's Class1 selection, or -- without any synthetic data -- forcing the Litanies' own RG 109(f) privilege to Ordinary, which makes the transferred candidate lose that same cap against its own real target. Fixed by adding target-omitted membership as a third disjunct in settled_at. New regression test in test_calendar.ml, built the same way: the real EF layer plus one synthetic privileged Commemoration_only entry on the real 2011 transfer target, sorting ahead of the Litanies so it wins the Class1 slot. Mutation-verified to fail specifically when the third disjunct is removed. COLITUR_EXHAUSTIVE_SWEEP=1 dune test --force stays clean after the fix, confirming it changes no shipped day's output. 2026-08-13T18:15:14Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-13T18:15:14Z urn:sha1:7c3964be29a8902ec6fa3965a67586483313dc4e Calendar.build_day's `unresolved` check decided whether a Transfer-disposed candidate had genuinely settled at its target by checking only whether it became that day's own `observed` celebration. That was correct for every prior use of Precedence.Transfer: a losing FEAST, which RG-96-style rules guarantee an unblocked target to win outright once it arrives. It is not correct in general. A rite's rules are free to dispose a Celebration.status = Commemoration_only candidate as Transfer too (the EF Major Litanies, RG 80, do exactly this) -- and such a candidate can never become `observed` anywhere, by the same status that makes it eligible to transfer in the first place. The old check mislabelled a cleanly-settled transfer of that shape as "did not converge" (a hardcoded string, not a real read of the placement pass's own convergence) and double-counted it in Validate's own duplicated-sighting check. Replaced with `settled_at`, which re-resolves the target date and accepts either `observed` or membership in that day's own admitted commemorations. A strict superset of the old check -- every existing use (a transferred feast winning its target) is unaffected -- and stays rite-agnostic: it reads only Precedence.resolution's existing fields, no EF-specific knowledge added to the kernel. Found by the exhaustive property sweep (COLITUR_EXHAUSTIVE_SWEEP=1) the moment a rite first produced this shape, not anticipated in advance. 2026-08-11T19:29:13Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-11T19:29:13Z urn:sha1:1d6be4ac281e62accfb905b137b3c6b494183ee4 Four findings from Task 6 review, addressed on top of f15e44d. 1. transferred_out was a single Date.t option, so when RG 97-98 collides three or more feasts on one date (more than one loser), only the last one Hashtbl.iter happened to visit survived -- a genuinely lost move, and which one survived depended on OCaml's hash seed (OCAMLRUNPARAM=R), an environment read a kernel invariant forbids. RG 97-98 says coinciding feasts transfer "in order" -- plural -- so the type was wrong, not the fixture: transferred_out is now (Celebration.t * Date.t) list. transferred_in stays a single option, deliberately: a day receives at most one arrival (RG 96 sends each departure to the next non-I/II-class day, and the first to arrive occupies it). The per-day list is canonicalised (sorted by target date, then slug) after accumulation, the same fix layer.ml already applies to its own date-bucket index and for the same reason. Verified clean across 15 runs under OCAMLRUNPARAM=R; disabling the canonicalisation step showed the raw order genuinely flip between seeds, confirming the fix is load-bearing. 2. Every deferred candidate in the fixture was the same rank, so compare_deferred's band branch was unreachable and reversing it broke nothing -- the RG 97-98 test was pinning slug order, not band order. The fixture now has three ranks (Hi1 outranks Hi2, both transfer, both outrank Lo), with slugs chosen so band order and slug order disagree. Reversing the band comparison now fails the test on "higher-band loser claims 2 Feb first", received the wrong slug instead. 3. A transfer_target free to name any date could place a candidate outside the liturgical year's own start/stop bounds: invisible to year/build_day, so it would be observed nowhere and, since its origin's re-resolution would report it as settled, omitted nowhere either -- genuinely gone, contradicting calendar.mli's "never silently dropped". place_transfers now checks the range on every placement and routes an out-of-range one to a permanent-exclusion table instead of assignment, with its own cited omitted reason. 4. Precedence.resolve folds Transfer and Repose into one deferred case, and place_transfers routed all of it through transfer_target (RG 96's search), which is only correct for Transfer. Repose is RG 100-102's repositio, a distinct rubric this module does not implement. Documented rather than split into a second mechanism: nothing in the EF ruleset returns Repose (design spec section 1.3, "declared, not exercised"), so the gap is latent, not a live bug. Two new tests (origin records every departure; transfer target outside year is recorded not lost); the RG 97-98 test's fixture and assertions rewritten for finding 2. 2026-08-11T19:03:00Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-11T19:03:00Z urn:sha1:f15e44dd4c1b871c2daeb952b1c8c848274ea1f1 Calendar.year now runs a placement pass after resolving every day: each deferred candidate (RG 95's I-class-only right of translation, via Precedence's Transfer disposition) is placed on the next day the rite's new Rite.t.transfer_target names as admissible, transferred_in/out are set on the two ends of the move, and the whole year is re-resolved to a fixed point, bounded by a hard max_transfer_rounds = 64 guard. transfer_target is rite-supplied rather than a generic search Calendar drives itself: RG 96's 'not I or II class' is not derivable from band or disposition alone (RG 91's own table lets a universal I-class feast outrank an ordinary Sunday in a raw contest, yet RG 96 forbids landing a translation there regardless), and the search's starting point is rite-specific too (the Annunciation exception). It takes an occupant callback exposing what Calendar currently resolves as observed on any date, so the rite never has to re-implement occurrence resolution. Two correctness properties drove most of the design: - A candidate's permanent natural loss at its own origin (the layer entry never moves) is rediscovered every round; left unfiltered this oscillates a placed candidate between two dates forever, since its own rank makes it look 'occupied' to a fresh search from its origin. Both the round loop's gather and the final per-day omitted accounting filter this out, keeping only sightings that are either brand new or losing at a candidate's *current* target (a fresh RG 97-98 bump). - RG 97-98's sort has to actually decide something, not just happen to agree with Precedence.resolve's own tie-break next round: a claimed-this-round overlay lets earlier-processed candidates in one round block later ones in the same pass, so two coinciding I-class feasts land on consecutive admissible days in the one round they collide, in band order. Also folds in Task 5's review finding: year_bounds clamps y to [1582, 9999] once, up front, rather than guarding start and stop independently (each guard only ever covered one of the two rite.year_start calls, leaving year 999 and year 100000 each able to call it out of domain through the other branch). 2026-08-11T18:07:55Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-11T18:07:55Z urn:sha1:953427d8d1e3a34994be53b60e18662ec26fef4e Precedence.resolution already tracked what happened to every losing candidate -- commemorated, deferred, or omitted with a reason -- but Liturgical_day.t had nowhere for the deferred and omitted buckets to land, so Calendar dropped them at the door. Task 12's no-celebration-lost invariant needs to read that accounting off the day result itself, not re-resolve every day to reconstruct it, so a reason recorded nowhere is not recorded. Add Liturgical_day.omitted : ('r Celebration.t * string) list, after transferred_out and before citations. Calendar.resolve_day now folds resolution.omitted (Precedence's own native omissions, reasons intact) and resolution.deferred (mapped to "deferred: transfer placement not yet implemented (Task 6)") into it. Adds a full-day accounting test against the whole Calendar pipeline: four colliding sanctoral entries plus the day's feria, checked as a slug set (matching test_precedence.ml's own nothing-silently-lost test) so a candidate silently dropped or duplicated into two buckets would fail it, plus an identity check that the deferred and admission-limit reasons don't get swapped. 2026-08-11T18:01:54Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-11T18:01:31Z urn:sha1:8de560db7fb1b7b7d3ca93285068c6a4214e0bff Transfers make per-date resolution impossible to do correctly: resolving 25 March can push a feast onto 26 March, and RG 97-98 has coinciding I-class feasts transfer in table order, which needs global knowledge. So year computes a whole liturgical year in one pass and day indexes into it. Pure, no cache, no mutable state. This commit resolves each day but does not yet place deferred transfers; they are recorded with a reason. Task 6 adds the placement pass.