deterministic OCaml engine to compute and validate liturgical calendars for multiple rites, template-driven output to year 9999 https://git.labunix.xyz/colitur.git/atom?h=v0.1.0 2026-08-12T09:19:51Z 2026-08-12T09:19:51Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-12T09:19:51Z urn:sha1:d0b78ca2ef533080d4621b22071718bb8d3a6158 precedence_ef.mli said "there is no fifth, unclassified case" after the same commit renumbered the disposition list from four cases to five; the count is now six. precedence.mli's physical-equality obligation described the failure mode as counting a drop "a SECOND time (once because it is genuinely absent, once because its identity no longer matches)" -- the same condition stated twice. What actually happens to a rebuilt candidate record is that the celebration surfaces in BOTH commemorations (the copy) and omitted (the original), one admission double-reported. precedence_ef.ml carried the same muddled sentence, which is where the kernel's copy came from; both now say it plainly. vocab.ml/.mli referenced {!Rite_ef.rite_ef.ml} -- a filename inside an odoc reference, which is malformed. Now plain [Rite_ef.rite]. README documented only `dune test`, so the exhaustive 1583-9999 Validate sweep was discoverable only by reading test_validate.ml's own comment. With no CI in this repo, that line is what stands between a committed artifact and one anyone runs. No behaviour change: `colitur day` output is byte-identical across 1583, 1900, 1902, 2008, 2011, 2026, 2038 and 9999 (2921 days, both domain edges). 259 tests by default, 260 with the sweep. 2026-08-12T08:40:27Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-12T08:40:27Z urn:sha1:6d6ba502d8022d9e0b8cdc5302f5761d39895192 Several comments described work as "arriving with Plan 3" or "waiting for Plan 3" that either shipped without it or refer to the wrong future plan number, all now false in ways that would mislead the next reader: - temporal_ef.ml (two places) and precedence_ef.ml said the Major Litanies (25 April, RG 80) "arrive with Plan 3's sanctoral". Plan 3 shipped, in this branch, without them; register §6 tracks this as a plain open item with no plan committed to build it, and now says so. - temporal_ef.ml said the Sacred Triduum's "own named offices are a Plan 3 sanctoral addition". Wrong on two counts: Plan 3 shipped without adding them, AND a proper office for I-class FERIAS was never a sanctoral matter in the first place (RG 21 defines "feria" to exclude Sundays/feasts, not the reverse). 2026-04-02/03/04 still resolve to the ordinary Passiontide ferial fallback's own generic slugs (ef-passiontide-2-{thursday,friday,saturday}), confirmed against real output; register §6 now records this as its own open item. - temporal_ef.ml said the Rogation-Wednesday commemoration (Ascension Vigil day, entry 21) "waits for RG 108-111" -- both the precedence framework and RG 108-111 exist now; the Wednesday's own commemoration is still never constructed, but for a different, still-real reason (no candidate is wired for it), not a forward dependency. Fixed at both of this comment's two occurrences in the file. - vocab.ml/vocab.mli's `seasons` field doc said "Validate's contiguity check reads this" -- false since validate.ml's "seasons" check switched to Rite.t.season_runs in this branch (rite-supplied, to support a season appearing in more than one run, which the modern form's Ordinary Time needs and EF does not). - vocab.ml/vocab.mli's `ranks` field doc said "it is not a precedence relation until Plan 3 defines one" -- Plan 3 did define one (RG 111's dignity ordering), but as its own small, separately-hardcoded function in precedence_ef.ml, not one derived from this field; corrected to say so precisely rather than leaving a forward-looking claim unresolved. - The lectionary bootstrap (reading citations, Liturgical_day.t's own `citations` field) is called "Plan 3" at slug.ml, vocab_ef.ml, and three places in temporal_ef.ml, but "Plan 4" at liturgical_day.mli (whose own doc comment -- "always empty until Plan 4" -- is the authoritative one: the SANCTORAL bootstrap is Plan 3 and shipped; the LECTIONARY bootstrap is a separate, later Plan 4). All six corrected to say Plan 4, cross-referencing the Plan 3/4 distinction at the first (slug.ml) occurrence so the reasoning is not duplicated six times. No behaviour change: every edit here is a comment/documentation correction. Verified byte-identical `colitur day` output across 1583, 1900, 1902, 2008, 2011, 2026, 2038, 9999. 259/259 tests green. 2026-08-11T09:59:43Z Lukasz Kasprzak lukas@labunix.xyz 2026-08-11T09:59:43Z urn:sha1:abade24943f2f77c058b5ff768093b8babc9a8c3 Rite specificity is carried by type parameters plus a vocab record of operations rather than by functors: the same guarantee that a rite cannot name another rite's season, without threading module plumbing through every kernel module. Celebration takes only the rank parameter, since it has no season field and OCaml rejects a type variable that appears in no field.