docs: a confidence raised while its revisit trigger was deleted

Five follow-ups from the fix-round re-review, none touching a computed
result.

M20's note had said "moderate-high, not certain" with a specific revisit
trigger attached. The fix round raised the label to "near-certain" and
deleted the trigger in the same edit. Upgrading a confidence while
removing the condition that would lower it again is the one move this
record must not make, so the trigger is restored alongside the higher
label: no primary text anywhere names the Major Litanies in a
Mass-orations-count worked example, only the general II-class-Sunday
rule twice over. RG 434(b) closes the Office-shaped doubt and nothing
further.

"WORD-IDENTICAL" overstated the relation between RG 111(b) and n.
434(b). Only the trailing "quae tamen omittitur si commemoratio
privilegiata facienda sit" is verbatim in both; the openings differ,
n. 434(b) recasting the rule into the orations register. The claim was
self-refuting -- both texts are quoted adjacent to it -- and the
argument never depended on it. Now "identical in its operative clause".

And n. 434 is not "a different part of the same document": the running
heads put RG 111 under Rubricae generales and n. 434 under Rubricae
generales Missalis Romani, two distinct corpora bound in one volume,
which is the entire force of the corroboration. The code comment had
understated its own point.

Also corrects the register's LT line range for n. 434(b) (3574-3576, not
3564-3570; the (b) clause is not in the cited range), and records in
calendar.ml the diagnostic that channel (3) trades away: a rite whose
transfer_target names a date its own disposition omits used to raise a
loud, mislabelled Validate failure and is now silent at the origin. The
kernel cannot distinguish that from a deliberate omission without rite
knowledge it must not have, so accepting it is right -- but the signal
is gone, and that should be written down rather than discovered later.

1 files changed, 12 insertions, 1 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rites/rite_ef/precedence_ef.ml b/lib/rites/rite_ef/precedence_ef.ml
index b3c9ab5..c9e6a55 100644
--- a/lib/rites/rite_ef/precedence_ef.ml
+++ b/lib/rites/rite_ef/precedence_ef.ml
@@ -1627,7 +1627,18 @@ let admit ~(observed : Vocab_ef.rank Precedence.candidate)
          documents: "in dominicis II classis, nulla alia admittitur
          oratio, praeter commemorationem festi II classis, quae tamen
          omittitur si commemoratio privilegiata facienda sit" --
-         WORD-IDENTICAL to the clause above, but explicitly scoped "post
+         IDENTICAL IN ITS OPERATIVE CLAUSE to the one above -- not word
+         for word throughout: RG 111(b) opens "una tantum admittitur
+         commemoratio, SCILICET DE FESTO II CLASSIS", n. 434(b) recasts
+         that into the orations register as "NULLA ALIA ADMITTITUR ORATIO,
+         PRAETER COMMEMORATIONEM festi II classis", and only the trailing
+         "quae tamen omittitur si commemoratio privilegiata facienda sit"
+         is verbatim in both. That trailing clause is the one this
+         adjudication turns on. And n. 434 is not merely a different part
+         of the same document: the running heads show RG 111 under
+         "Rubricae generales" and n. 434 under "Rubricae generales Missalis
+         Romani" -- two distinct rubrical corpora bound in one volume,
+         which is the whole force of the corroboration. Explicitly scoped "post
          orationem Missae" -- an independent, Mass-structure-rubric
          confirmation of the exact same privilege-overrides-ordinary rule
          this branch already implements, from a different part of the