diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp')
| -rw-r--r-- | data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp | 28 |
1 files changed, 28 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp b/data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp index 633d2e0..a045415 100644 --- a/data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp +++ b/data/of/expected-divergences-litcal.sexp @@ -139,6 +139,34 @@ ; RG 112(a) does on the EF side for a narrower case. NOT fixed here (a ; kernel-level tie-break policy is out of this task's own scope regardless ; of verdict). +; +; UPDATE 2026-08-28: a CANDIDATE citation has since been found, and it +; points AGAINST colitur's current answer. Tabula I.3 does not name a bare +; category; it enumerates one in a definite order -- "Sollemnitates DOMINI, +; beatae Mariae Virginis, et SANCTORUM in Calendario generali inscriptae". +; The Sacred Heart is a Solemnity of the Lord; the Nativity of St John the +; Baptist is a Solemnity of a Saint. Read as ordered, that entry puts the +; Lord first, litcal's answer is right and colitur's alphabetical tie-break +; is reaching a conclusion the text already settles. colitur's own EF side +; models exactly this shape already -- RG 91 entry 14's "primum mobilia, +; deinde fixa" is a within-entry order, and Precedence_ef.band expresses it +; by scaling the whole table x10 so a half-row sits between its neighbours. +; Precedence_of.band is scaled x10 too, so I.3 could carry 30/31/32 with no +; structural change. +; +; The counter-argument, which is why this stays OPEN rather than becoming a +; fix: Tabula entry 4 marks its own internal order with explicit a) b) c) d) +; lettering, so the drafters had a way to signal ordering and used it. Entry +; 3 is a plain "A, B, et C" list. Entry 2's own list ("Nativitas Domini, +; Epiphania, Ascensio et Pentecostes...") cannot be an ordering at all, +; since those days can never collide with each other -- which is evidence +; that a list inside an entry need not imply precedence. +; +; What would settle it: any authoritative source treating 24 June in a +; Sacred-Heart-collision year -- an ordo, a Notitiae reply, or a +; conference decree. The collision is rare (Easter must be late enough to +; put Easter+68 on 24 June) and none of the project's current witnesses +; covers such a year. Verdict stays open; behaviour unchanged. ((id L6) (citation "precedence.ml's compare_by (Slug.compare tie-break); no Tabula/Normae text found ranking Sacred Heart above/below the Nativity of John the Baptist at equal band") (verdict open) |
