diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'data')
| -rw-r--r-- | data/ef/expected-divergences-efdotorg.sexp | 32 |
1 files changed, 32 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/data/ef/expected-divergences-efdotorg.sexp b/data/ef/expected-divergences-efdotorg.sexp index 7c9eea7..addecfe 100644 --- a/data/ef/expected-divergences-efdotorg.sexp +++ b/data/ef/expected-divergences-efdotorg.sexp @@ -71,6 +71,38 @@ (note "Our Lady of Ransom (24 September) is Commemoration_only-status data; the September Ember Saturday always wins the day outright. Fires once, 2026-09-24 (2025 and 2027's own 24 September already match colitur without needing this entry -- the Ember day is listed first there).") (expected_rows 1)) + + ; CORRECTED 2026-08-24 (coordinator): this entry reasoned correctly and + ; then recommended the opposite. It concludes, rightly, that the feast was + ; "never added to the GENERAL calendar" -- and then proposes it as a + ; candidate for CLAUDE.md's list of sanctoral entries MISSING from + ; colitur's universal data. Those cannot both be true, and acting on the + ; recommendation would be a REGRESSION: adding a particular-calendar feast + ; to the universal core is precisely what binding decision 2 forbids + ; ("any community's proper is an overlay, never core"). + ; + ; The Missal settles it from the primary source rather than from general + ; knowledge of the 1830 apparition. BOTH feasts named in E3 and E4 appear + ; in the Missal under its own heading "Missae pro aliquibus locis" -- + ; Masses FOR SOME PLACES: + ; docs/research/scan1.txt:52019, 52077, 52129 + ; "Missae pro aliquibus locis (B. M. V. Immaculatae a sacro Numismate)" + ; docs/research/scan1.txt:48793 + ; "Missae pro aliquibus locis (S. Ioannis Ap. et Ev. ante Portam Latinam)" + ; This is the Missal's OWN classification, and it is the same structural + ; test the register already relies on for universality: the calendarium + ; carries no "pro aliquibus locis" marker in its own lines, while the + ; wider Missal carries the marker elsewhere for exactly this class of + ; feast. + ; + ; So E3 and E4 are NOT sanctoral gaps and are NOT candidates for any + ; missing-entry list. They are particular-calendar feasts that colitur + ; correctly excludes from the universal core, and that belong in an + ; overlay -- the shape data/ef/examples/poland.ini and benedictine.ini + ; already demonstrate. The ordos carry them because those ordos serve + ; communities that keep them. Verdict [colitur] is unchanged and now rests + ; on the Missal's own words. + ; E3 -- colitur correct (a genuine sanctoral DATA GAP, not a rule bug). ; "Our Lady of the Miraculous Medal" (27 November) does not appear ; anywhere in data/ef/sanctoral.sexp (`grep -i medal` / `grep -i |