diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/test_precedence_ef.ml | 67 |
1 files changed, 42 insertions, 25 deletions
diff --git a/test/test_precedence_ef.ml b/test/test_precedence_ef.ml index 98ae0c8..4ee2fd8 100644 --- a/test/test_precedence_ef.ml +++ b/test/test_precedence_ef.ml @@ -715,31 +715,48 @@ let disposition_cases = "ef-synthetic-class3-lord-feast", an_ordinary_sunday, "Commemorate(Privileged)" ); - (* RG 112(a) (docs/research/rules-register.md §4/§6.0, primary text, - verified against BOTH photographic scans): "112. Ad commemorationes - et orationes quod attinet, haec insuper serventur: a) Officium, Missa - aut commemoratio de aliquo festo vel mysterio unius Divinae Personae - excludit commemorationem aut orationem de alio festo vel mysterio - eiusdem Divinae personae" -- the Office, Mass or commemoration of - some feast or MYSTERY of ONE Divine Person excludes a commemoration - or oration of ANOTHER feast or mystery of the SAME Divine Person. - Real witness, the ONE date these two candidates can ever coincide: - Holy Family (RG 17(b)) as winner, the Commemoration of the Baptism - of the Lord (13 January, data/ef/sanctoral.sexp: Class2, subject - Lord, status Feast) as loser, on the seven years 13 January is - itself Holy Family's own date (2008, 2013, 2019, 2030, 2036, 2041, - 2047). Directly confirmed by the Missal's own MORE SPECIFIC rubric, - found in the Holy Family Mass propers themselves (both photographic - scans, word for word): "Si festum S. Familiae occurrerit die 13 - ianuarii, Missa dicitur de festo S. Familiae, SINE COMMEMORATIONE - BAPTISMATIS D.N.I.C., et sine commemoratione dominicae" -- if the - feast of the Holy Family occurs on 13 January, the Mass is said of - the Holy Family, WITHOUT commemoration of the Baptism, and without - commemoration of the Sunday (RG 17(b)'s own general rule, restated). - The electronic transcription (1962-06-23,_SS_Ioannes_XXIII,_Missale - _Romanum,_LT.pdf) carries NEITHER sentence at all -- exactly the - transcription's own documented defect (this project's methodology - note), not merely absent from this one check. *) + (* PRIMARY authority -- CORRECTED, fix round 1 (coordinator finding 7): + RG 95's own second paragraph, present in ALL THREE documents + including the electronic transcription: "Si vero duo festa eiusdem + Divinae Personae... simul occurrunt, fit de festo, quod in tabella + praecedentiae superiorem obtinet locum et aliud omittitur" -- if two + feasts of the SAME DIVINE PERSON occur together, the one higher in + the table is kept, the OTHER OMITTED -- an occurrence-level rule + closer to this exact collision than RG 112(a) below. + CORROBORATION, RG 112(a) (docs/research/rules-register.md §4/§6.0, + primary text, verified against all three documents): "112. Ad + commemorationes et orationes quod attinet, haec insuper serventur: + a) Officium, Missa aut commemoratio de aliquo festo vel mysterio + unius Divinae Personae excludit commemorationem aut orationem de + alio festo vel mysterio eiusdem Divinae personae" -- the Office, + Mass or commemoration of some feast or MYSTERY of ONE Divine Person + excludes a commemoration or oration of ANOTHER feast or mystery of + the SAME Divine Person. Real witness, the ONE date these two + candidates can ever coincide: Holy Family (RG 17(b)) as winner, the + Commemoration of the Baptism of the Lord (13 January, data/ef/ + sanctoral.sexp: Class2, subject Lord, status Feast) as loser, on the + seven years 13 January is itself Holy Family's own date (2008, 2013, + 2019, 2030, 2036, 2041, 2047). + CORROBORATION 2, the Holy Family Mass propers' own more specific + rubric, both photographic scans, word for word (real, and settles 13 + January on its own regardless of RG 95/112(a)): "Si festum S. + Familiae occurrerit die 13 ianuarii, Missa dicitur de festo S. + Familiae, SINE COMMEMORATIONE BAPTISMATIS D.N.I.C., et sine + commemoratione dominicae" -- if the feast of the Holy Family occurs + on 13 January, the Mass is said of the Holy Family, WITHOUT + commemoration of the Baptism, and without commemoration of the + Sunday (RG 17(b)'s own general rule, restated). + CORRECTED, fix round 1 (coordinator finding 2): a previous version of + this comment claimed the electronic transcription's absence of this + specific rubric was "exactly the transcription's own documented + defect" -- WRONG, struck. That transcription (a 2006 web capture) + carries almost no Mass-propers text of any kind (5 Introit + occurrences in 26,322 lines against 61/402 in the two photographic + scans; its own "Proprium de Tempore" page is a table of contents + linking to PDFs the capture never pulled in) -- a coverage gap, not + a silent drop from content it otherwise has. RG 112 itself, unlike + this rubric, IS present in full in the transcription (all four + sub-clauses, verbatim) -- checked directly, not assumed. *) ( "RG112(a): a feast/mystery of the Lord excludes a commemoration of \ ANOTHER feast/mystery of the Lord -- Omit, not Commemorate (Holy \ Family vs the Baptism of the Lord, 13 January)", |