diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml | 105 |
1 files changed, 67 insertions, 38 deletions
diff --git a/tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml b/tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml index 357cb81..7fb186d 100644 --- a/tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml +++ b/tools/bootstrap_lectionary.ml @@ -479,25 +479,47 @@ let holy_name_entries = generator relies on here; not re-derived, read directly from the code that computes them). + NOT RG 17(a) -- CORRECTED, fix round 1 (coordinator review): RG 17(a) + itself (scan1.txt:396-402, "festum Ssmi Nominis Iesu, celebrandum + dominica quae occurrit a die 2 ad 5 ianuarii... secus die 2 ianuarii") + states only the day-identity PRIVILEGE (which day the feast falls on), + nothing about ferial Masses -- exactly the distinction docs/research/ + rules-register.md's own account already draws ("a THIRD, more specific + primary text... the Mass propers' own rubric for this feast", + deliberately NOT folded into RG 17(a) there). All three rubrics below + are Mass-PROPERS rubrics, printed as part of a feast's own Mass + heading, not General Rubrics chapter text -- and the second and third + are a DIFFERENT feast's propers from the first, not a continuation of + it (see each bullet's own attribution). + - [ef-christmas-1-{monday,tuesday,wednesday,thursday,friday}] (2-5 - January, EXCLUDING Saturday -- see below): RG 17(a)'s OWN rubric, - immediately following the Holy-Name-Sunday heading, both scans, word - for word: "Diebus ferialibus a 2 ad 5 ianuarii Missa dicitur ut die 1 - ianuarii" (scan1.txt:6522-6526) / "Diebus ferialibus a 2 ad 6 - ianuarii Missa dicitur ut die 1 ianuarii" (scan2.txt, the "6" a - one-digit OCR variant of scan1's "5" -- immaterial either way, since - 6 January is always Epiphany, a fixed I-class feast outranking any - ferial rubric outright) -- ON FERIAL DAYS from 2 to 5 January, THE - SAME MASS AS 1 JANUARY (the Circumcision) IS SAID. + January, EXCLUDING Saturday -- see below): the Missal's own + Mass-propers rubric for the Most Holy Name of Jesus, printed + immediately BEFORE the Sunday-shape Mass heading (not after it), + both scans, word for word: "Diebus ferialibus a 2 ad 5 ianuarii + Missa dicitur ut die 1 ianuarii" (scan1.txt:6522-6526) / "Diebus + ferialibua a 2 ad fi ianuarii Missa dicitur ut die 1 ianuarii" + (scan2.txt:7213-7217 -- OCR-garbled there, "ferialibua"/"fi" for + "ferialibus"/"5"; scan1 is clean and missalemeum's own extraction + corroborates the citation this rubric produces, so the reading is + not in doubt) -- ON FERIAL DAYS from 2 to 5 January, THE SAME MASS + AS 1 JANUARY (the Circumcision) IS SAID. - [ef-christmas-2-{monday,tuesday,wednesday,thursday,friday}] (7 January through the day before Holy Family Sunday's own civil date, - EXCLUDING Saturday -- see below): the SAME rubric's own next - sentence, both scans, word for word: "Diebus ferialibus a 7 ad 12 - ianuarii ANTE dominicam I post Epiphaniam occurrentibus, dicitur - Missa de festo Epiphaniae" (scan1.txt:6753-6757, scan2.txt - corroborates) -- ON FERIAL DAYS from 7 to 12 January occurring BEFORE - the first Sunday after Epiphany (Holy Family), THE MASS OF THE FEAST - OF EPIPHANY IS SAID. + EXCLUDING Saturday -- see below): a DIFFERENT Mass-propers rubric + block, ~230 scan1 lines after the one immediately above, sitting + within HOLY FAMILY'S OWN feast propers (RG 17(b)'s feast, page + header "Sanctae Familiae Iesu, Mariae, Ioseph", scan1.txt:6751/ + scan2.txt:7412), printed immediately BEFORE the "DOMINICA PRIMA post + Epiphaniam / SANCTAE FAMILIAE" Mass heading -- the same structural + position the rubric above occupies relative to Holy Name's own + heading, but a different feast's propers, not a continuation of the + same rubric: "Diebus ferialibus a 7 ad 12 ianuarii ANTE dominicam I + post Epiphaniam occurrentibus, dicitur Missa de festo Epiphaniae" + (scan1.txt:6753-6757; scan2.txt:7413-7415 corroborates, OCR-garbled + -- "occurentibus"/"Epipbaniee" -- reading not in doubt) -- ON FERIAL + DAYS from 7 to 12 January occurring BEFORE the first Sunday after + Epiphany (Holy Family), THE MASS OF THE FEAST OF EPIPHANY IS SAID. - [ef-time-after-epiphany-1-{monday,tuesday,wednesday,thursday,friday}] (Holy Family Sunday's own week, EXCLUDING Saturday -- see below, straddling the Christmastide/Time-after-Epiphany season boundary on @@ -506,20 +528,22 @@ let holy_name_entries = Time-after-Epiphany ferial fallback... will give the rest of that same Sunday-to-Saturday week", so one hand-authored value covers the whole week regardless of which code path computed the slug for a - given civil day): the rubric's own THIRD sentence, same citation, a - named formula rather than a second "repeat the Sunday" instruction: - "post eandem dominicam vero Missa de eadem dominica In excelso - throno, ut infra... Haec Missa dicenda est diebus ferialibus huius - hebdomadae" (scan1.txt:6758-6851, the formula's own heading "MISSA - DOMINICAE PRIMAE post Epiphaniam" immediately below) -- Epistle - "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli ad Romanos. Rom. 12, 1-5" - (scan1.txt:6875-6877), Gospel the SAME pericope as Holy Family's own - Sunday Mass, Luke 2:42-52 (printed out in full immediately below the - Epistle, scan1.txt:6885-6905) -- a DIFFERENT Epistle from Holy Family - Sunday's own (Col 3:12-17), but the SAME Gospel, exactly as - missalemeum's own fixture rows show (2026-01-12/2027-01-11/ - 2027-01-12: Gospel already agreed before this fix, only the Epistle - diverged). + given civil day): the SAME Holy Family propers block immediately + above, its own next sentence, a named formula rather than a second + "repeat the Sunday" instruction: "post eandem dominicam vero Missa + de eadem dominica In excelso throno, ut infra... Haec Missa dicenda + est diebus ferialibus huius hebdomadae" (scan1.txt:6758-6851; + scan2.txt:7415-7434 corroborates "In excelso throno... ut infra", + OCR-garbled elsewhere in the same passage, reading not in doubt), + the formula's own heading "MISSA DOMINICAE PRIMAE post Epiphaniam" + immediately below -- Epistle "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli + ad Romanos. Rom. 12, 1-5" (scan1.txt:6875-6877), Gospel the SAME + pericope as Holy Family's own Sunday Mass, Luke 2:42-52 (printed out + in full immediately below the Epistle, scan1.txt:6885-6905) -- a + DIFFERENT Epistle from Holy Family Sunday's own (Col 3:12-17), but + the SAME Gospel, exactly as missalemeum's own fixture rows show + (2026-01-12/2027-01-11/2027-01-12: Gospel already agreed before this + fix, only the Epistle diverged). - 13 January's OWN separate case, checked and found to need NO entry here: when Holy Family does not fall there, 13 January carries a II-class sanctoral commemoration of its own ("Commemoration of the @@ -544,14 +568,19 @@ let holy_name_entries = this ranking whenever the day's own office would otherwise be a plain Class4 feria, checked in {!Rite_ef.Temporal_ef}'s own [bvm_saturday_names] comment and confirmed against the real resolver here, not assumed). - This window's own five otherwise-unoccupied Saturdays inside these - three families (2026-01-03, 2026-01-10, 2027-01-09; 2026-01-17 and - 2027-01-16 are won outright by a saint instead, Anthony and Marcellus I - respectively, whose own citations are unaffected either way) genuinely - ARE the BVM Office, missalemeum's own title confirming it on every one - that reaches the office at all ("II Mass of the B. V. M. -- Vultum - Tuum", never "Feria") -- so none of the three "repeat X" rubrics above - ever actually apply on a Saturday. The three [-saturday] slugs are + This window's own SIX otherwise-unoccupied Saturdays inside these + three families (2026-01-03, 2026-01-10, 2027-01-02, 2027-01-09; + 2026-01-17 and 2027-01-16 are won outright by a saint instead, Anthony + and Marcellus I respectively, whose own citations are unaffected + either way) genuinely ARE the BVM Office, missalemeum's own title + confirming it on every one that reaches the office at all ("II Mass of + the B. V. M. -- Vultum Tuum", never "Feria") -- so none of the three + "repeat X" rubrics above ever actually apply on a Saturday. (CORRECTED, + fix round 1, coordinator review: this comment previously counted only + five, omitting 2027-01-02 -- `ef-christmas-2-saturday`, the same shape + as 2026-01-10 -- from its own list; no consequence for the code, which + already excludes every [-saturday] slug in all three families + unconditionally, not by enumerating dates.) The three [-saturday] slugs are DELIBERATELY left unentered, all three: the BVM Saturday Office's own citation is a genuine, ALREADY-DOCUMENTED open item (register, Task 6's own residual concern 4, "the BVM Saturday Office still emits its |