| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
|---|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Ran the round-2 hardened check_citations.py against lang/la.ini and fixed
every WRONG and MALFORMED finding. Baseline before this task: 12 WRONG,
42 CANNOT VERIFY (round-1 tool). After the round-2 tool alone (data
unchanged): 9 WRONG, 10 MALFORMED, 1 CANNOT VERIFY -- the rarity rule
cleared 41 of the 42 CANNOT VERIFY entries by itself, as expected. After
this cleanup: 0 WRONG, 0 MALFORMED, 0 CANNOT VERIFY, 292 citations checked
(up from 272 -- several wide ranges became more granular, individually
verified citations).
What changed, all in comments, no `key = value` entry touched:
- Three genuine wrong citations found and corrected: advent's own
citation was pointing at christmastide's real heading (LT.txt:8631,
"Tempus Nativitatis") 22 lines off from its own (LT.txt:8609) --
christmastide had never had a working citation of its own at all, the
right line sitting unused inside advent's corrective note. Restructured
so each entry cites its own real line, including giving
time-after-epiphany its own citation (LT.txt:8668) for the first time.
- Ten MALFORMED wide ranges (introduced by round 1's own tolerance
removal, never capped until round 2) replaced with precise per-entry
citations -- mostly comma lists of exact bare line numbers, since each
TOC section lists one heading per line; two are legitimate multi-line
wraps kept as capped explicit ranges (a 2-line Nativity-octave heading
split by an unrelated saint's day; Christ the King's own in-body heading
split across a page-number line).
- Six citation-shaped substrings that were never genuine provenance
claims lost their "LT.txt:" prefix (now read "line NNNN"), each with an
inline note explaining why: two were corrective prose quoting a
historical WRONG value ("previously cited LT.txt:8631/12459, which
is..."), three were contextual pointers to a NEARBY but different
heading used for explanation, and one discloses an unmodelled alternate
wording. None of these ever claimed to be this entry's own heading;
writing them as "LT.txt:N" only let the checker mistake documentation
for a claim.
- Two genuinely correct citations left permanently unable to pass an
automated word-overlap check, for reasons orthogonal to correctness
(disclosed in check_citations.py's own docstring as an accepted
trade-off) also lost their "LT.txt:" prefix, each verified by hand and
noted as corroborating rather than primary: class-1..4's "classis" (the
only distinctive word in "I classis" etc., 500+ occurrences across
LT.txt -- RG 8 is the primary source); Corpus Christi's and Holy Name's
own TOC lines, both abbreviated ("Ss.mi"/"Ss.mae") where every entry
below spells the same title out in full, and neither has a spelled-out
occurrence anywhere else in this partial 2006 web-capture transcription
to cite instead (Holy Name also has a stronger primary source already:
temporal_ef.ml's own scan-verified string).
No rule was weakened to reach zero: every de-prefixed reference was
verified by hand against the transcription first, and none of them was
ever wrong -- each was either documentation, context, or evidence the
checker's own disclosed word-overlap/rarity design cannot confirm.
Claude-Session: https://claude.ai/code/session_017ZBxCCRM2ojnBupp3SBxV9
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Sanctoral names are transcribed from the Missal's own calendarium and
kept in the GENITIVE, as the Missal prints them -- noted in the file so
nobody corrects them to the nominative.
English reuses the 327 names already in data/ef/sanctoral.sexp rather
than retyping them, and declares fallback = la, so an untranslated day in
an English booklet shows Latin rather than a slug. The test asserts the
FALLBACK works rather than that en.ini is exhaustive: that is what makes
a partial translation shippable from its first line.
Coverage now demands a name for every slug the engine can emit across
2020-2045, temporal and sanctoral alike.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Two of la.ini's LT.txt:<n> citations pointed at the wrong line -- the
Latin itself was right, only the pinned line was wrong:
- advent cited LT.txt:8631 ("Tempus Nativitatis"); the real "Tempus
Adventus" heading is at 8609.
- ef-christ-the-king and [rank]'s own citation both pointed near
"Dominica ultima Octobris" (12459) when the text they actually quote,
"D.NI NOSTRI JESU CHRISTI REGIS" and "I classis", sits two and three
lines further down, at 12461 and 12462.
ef-christmas-sunday-0 was marked PATTERN but LT.txt:8644 is the identical
string verbatim -- relabelled as a direct citation, not constructed.
Added tools/check_citations.py and `make check-citations`: for every
LT.txt:<n> citation outside a PATTERN block, confirms a +-2-line window
around line n actually contains the Latin text the citation claims,
rather than trusting each of the 38 citations by hand. Follows
check-schema/check-templates' own precedent -- docs/ is gitignored, so
the target prints SKIPPED loudly and exits 0 when docs/research/LT.txt
is absent, never a silent pass.
The checker's own teeth are proven three ways: replayed against the
pre-fix file it independently re-derives both corrections above; a fresh
mutation (redirecting one citation to an unrelated line) is caught and
reverted; the fixed file passes clean, 147 citations checked, 0 wrong.
|
|
|
Every entry is transcribed from the 1962 Missal's own propers headings in
docs/research/LT.txt and cites where it came from; names constructed by
following a neighbouring pattern are marked as such, so a reader can tell
transcription from inference.
The coverage test is the point of this commit. It walks every day of
2020-2045 and fails naming any slug with no Latin name -- the test that
would have caught the original defect, where a printed booklet said
ef-septuagesima-sunday-2 because nothing asserted that names exist.
The three Triduum names reuse the exact strings temporal_ef.ml already
carries, so the engine and the language file cannot disagree.
|
