| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Entries 5-9. Entries 5 and 7 differ only by subject -- 'Festa Domini'
against 'Festa beatae Mariae Virginis et Sanctorum' -- so they key on
Celebration.t.subject, the same field RG 91 entry 14 uses on the EF
side, never on the slug.
Entry 9's three clauses (late-Advent ferias from 17 December, the
Nativity octave, Lenten ferias) are what separates a privileged feria
from the ordinary one at entry 13.
CORRECTION to the task brief, applied here rather than after: entries
3, 5 and 7 test 'not (is_proper layer)', not 'is_universal layer'.
Every temporal-origin candidate Temporal_of.temporal constructs
carries layer = "temporal" unconditionally, never universal_layer, so
a positive universal-layer test silently excluded every temporal-cycle
solemnity and Lord-subject feast from these entries -- Corpus Christi
came out unclassified outright, and Trinity/Christ the King/Holy
Family/the Baptism of the Lord landed one entry too low. is_universal
is now dead and removed; entry 3's branch (written in Task 1) is
amended along with the new entries 5 and 7. Only entries 4 and 8 still
test is_proper directly, matching the Tabula's own proper-calendar
rows.
Also fixes a pre-existing typo in the brief's own 'entry 6: a Sunday
per annum' test row: rank was Sollemnitas, which -- being tested at
entry 3, earlier in the chain -- made the row fail regardless of the
is_universal/is_proper question, since no real Sunday per annum is
ever Sollemnitas. Changed to Festum, matching the adjacent 'Sunday of
Christmas time' row and real Temporal_of output.
|
