From 0158449f7060570bf3de17a8869b4ca668bd837f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Kasprzak Date: Tue, 18 Aug 2026 09:10:46 +0200 Subject: docs: CHANGELOG entry for 0.3.1 --- CHANGELOG.md | 3 +++ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+) diff --git a/CHANGELOG.md b/CHANGELOG.md index 1112bf8..4020df6 100644 --- a/CHANGELOG.md +++ b/CHANGELOG.md @@ -2,6 +2,9 @@ One line per release. Versions are git tags (`vX.Y.Z`). +## [0.3.1] - 2026-08-18 +- Adjudications and evidence only; no behaviour change. **M13 closed** — St Joseph is not displaced from Passion Friday: the hypothesis the entry rested on (a rubric at Joseph's own propers entry, "the same shape as the Annunciation's") was checked directly and is false, and the analogue does not exist either, the Annunciation's exception living in RG 96 rather than its propers. **Mass I of the BVM Saturday** needs no corroborating oracle year because none can exist: Advent has no IV-class ferias, so that office never falls there. **A third oracle window, 2035**, witnessing `isidore-of-seville` and with him `common-of-doctors`, the one Common no window had ever tested — closing step 4's blind spot as far as the method allows, the last two saints being unreachable by construction. 393 tests. + ## [0.3.0] - 2026-08-17 - Three EF corrections and a new resolution step, all argued from the Missal rather than from oracle agreement. **The votive Mass of Our Lady on Saturday** (RG 309(a)): the office had been kept since v0.1 but read the feria's Mass, so the day observed Our Lady and read the parable of the weeds; it now selects among the Missal's five *Missae de sancta Maria in sabbato* by season — 87 611 reading rows, every one a Saturday. **The Seven Sorrows of Passion Friday**, a movable commemoration colitur had no trace of, buildable only once `Date_spec` grew `Easter_offset`; adding it *reversed* an allow-list verdict, since RG 111(d) admits two commemorations on a III-class day and colitur admits exactly two where the oracle drops one. **The week after Trinity**, which now says the Mass the Missal prints for it, under RG 299's *nisi propria Missa assignetur* — and the same rule shows the Christ-the-King-week divergence was never a bug at all. RG 299 also closes a standing gap: the ferial-Mass rule was recorded as unconfirmed against the primary source and is now cited. -- cgit v1.3