From 184b3d677764524f58a28d7b4683a2a91a689555 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Kasprzak Date: Sat, 22 Aug 2026 17:59:45 +0200 Subject: docs(F1): settle the Good Friday Gloria on the source's own evidence F1 adjudicated the FIUV ordo's Good Friday "Gloria" against the ordo, but rested on external attestation and left a pdftotext misread unruled-out. The page image resolves both. The extraction is faithful: the printed book does carry that line. So the adjacent-block-misread possibility is ruled out rather than merely doubted. And the same page shows the compiler knew the distinction. Holy Saturday, its next entry, carries no Mass line at all -- correctly. Easter, the entry after, carries a full one -- correctly. Good Friday, which likewise has no Mass, wrongly receives one, word-for-word identical to Holy Thursday's on the preceding page, while its own Vespers rubric four lines below calls the day's rite an Actio liturgica rather than a Mass. Verdict unchanged. It now rests on internal evidence from the source rather than on every other authority disagreeing, which is the footing this project's own standard asks for. --- data/ef/expected-divergences-fiuv.sexp | 26 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ 1 file changed, 26 insertions(+) (limited to 'data') diff --git a/data/ef/expected-divergences-fiuv.sexp b/data/ef/expected-divergences-fiuv.sexp index 6ed9a04..6a40838 100644 --- a/data/ef/expected-divergences-fiuv.sexp +++ b/data/ef/expected-divergences-fiuv.sexp @@ -81,6 +81,32 @@ ; misread (a stray line from an adjacent block folded into this one) is ; not fully ruled out either -- named as a real possibility, not ; silently excluded. +; +; RESOLVED 2026-08-22 (coordinator): the page IMAGE was rendered and read +; (pdftoppm -f 48, the PDF page bearing printed folio 46). TWO findings. +; FIRST, the pdftotext layer is FAITHFUL -- the printed book really does +; carry "Missa pr., (omittuntur ps. Iudica me et Gloria Patri), Gloria, +; sine Credo, praef. comm." under FERIA VI IN PASSIONE ET MORTE DOMINI, so +; the adjacent-block-misread possibility named above is RULED OUT, not +; merely unlikely. +; SECOND, and this is what settles the adjudication rather than resting it +; on external attestation: the SAME PAGE proves the compiler knew the +; distinction and lost it here specifically. Its next entry, "4. Viol ... +; SABBATUM SANCTUM", carries NO "Missa pr." line at all -- correctly, Holy +; Saturday's own Mass being the Vigil's. The entry after it, "5. Alb DOM. +; RESURRECTIONIS", carries a full one. So on one page the book omits the +; Mass line where there is no Mass, and supplies one where there is; Good +; Friday, which likewise has none, wrongly receives one. Its own Vespers +; rubric on the same entry calls the day's rite "Actioni liturgicae +; vespertinae" -- an Action, not a Mass -- contradicting the Mass line four +; lines above it. +; The line is also WORD-FOR-WORD identical to Holy Thursday's own on the +; preceding page ("(omittuntur ps. Iudica me et Gloria Patri), Gloria, sine +; Credo"), where every word of it is correct. A copied line, not a +; considered statement. +; Verdict unchanged (colitur), now on internal evidence from the source +; itself rather than on "every other authority disagrees" -- which is the +; stronger footing, and the one this project's own standard asks for. ; F3 -- OPEN, single-witnessed, colitur's own possible gap (Te Deum ; axis). Fires 6 times, every one of the six dates -- cgit v1.3