From c63e37b8cbef1480b6f5677420425d22fe7061d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Kasprzak Date: Thu, 13 Aug 2026 17:37:40 +0200 Subject: docs: an invented Caput, a list that was not closed, and a blind spot Three corrections from the fix-round re-review, none changing behaviour. RG 431(e) was attributed to "Caput XX, De hymno Gloria in excelsis". There is no Caput XX -- the Rubricae Generales' Caput series ends at XIX. The paragraph number, letter and subsection title were all right; only the containing division was invented. It sits under "VIII -- De diversis Missae partibus", subsection "C) De hymno Gloria in excelsis". Shipping a new invented structural citation in the very round that corrected a source-fidelity overclaim is what the gate exists to catch. marian_slugs claimed TWO entries found and deliberately excluded after individual consideration, "not merely omitted". There was a third: vigil-of-the-assumption, 14 August, which is de B. Maria Virg. and whose collect implores her protection. It was merely omitted. Added to the list -- behaviourally inert, verified: it wins 7196 times domain-wide, always with the non-Marian eusebius-confessor as its only commemoration, and never loses -- but a closed list's whole value is its enumeration claim, and that claim was false as written. And the new rule has no comparison-layer witness at all. Reverting it reddens three tests, none of them a comparison layer: the differential's row type carries no commemorations, and the oracle's window has no 16-July Saturday. Worse, lectio's fixture DOES carry commemorations and prints +our-lady-of-mt-carmel on all 8 in-window dates where colitur now prints nothing -- a real divergence, neither fixed nor cited, swallowed by a blind spot, which binding decision 1 forbids. Recorded, with the note that colitur's reading here has no reference confirmation anywhere and only extending the oracle fixture to 2033 or later would settle it. Also records the RG 112(d) branch's ordering constraint: it precedes RG 95's Transfer branch, which it does not need to, and must move below it if a Class1 Marian entry is ever added. --- lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml | 8 ++++++-- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) (limited to 'lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml') diff --git a/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml b/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml index cf0d22c..4add824 100644 --- a/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml +++ b/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml @@ -631,8 +631,12 @@ let weekday_word d = Date.weekday_to_string (Date.weekday d) citation -- its own text reads "in Officio et Missa DE FESTIS" (of FEASTS), and this Office is not itself a festum (RG 91's own table position, entry 27, sits outside the Festa rows 11-13/16/19/20/23/24 - entirely). The tighter chain, found on the same scan: RG 431(e) (Caput - XX, "De hymno Gloria in excelsis") is the Missal's OWN classification of + entirely). The tighter chain, found on the same scan: RG 431(e) ("VIII -- De diversis + Missae partibus", subsection "C) De hymno Gloria in excelsis" -- NOT + "Caput XX", which does not exist: the Rubricae Generales' Caput series + ends at XIX. Corrected by the fix-round re-review; the paragraph number, + letter and subsection title were right, only the containing division was + invented) is the Missal's OWN classification of this exact Mass, word for word: "431. Hymnus Gloria in excelsis dicitur: ... e) in Missis votivis IV classis de Angelis, quocumque die, et de B. Maria Virg. QUAE IN SABBATO CELEBRANTUR" -- the Gloria is said -- cgit v1.3