From ea22ad2bde211998e6719fd5fb76233571a48383 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lukasz Kasprzak Date: Wed, 12 Aug 2026 15:16:00 +0200 Subject: fix(kernel,rite-ef): admit orders commemorations by RG 113's table of precedence, not slug Precedence_ef.admit broke a same-rank tie among commemoration candidates alphabetically by slug -- a deterministic engineering convention with no rubrical citation. RG 113's own second sentence, primary-source-verified against two independent scans and previously uncited in the register (only "commemoratio de Tempore fit primo loco" was quoted before), gives the real rule: "in admittendis et ordinandis aliis commemorationibus, servetur ordo tabellae praecedentiae" -- admitting and ordering commemorations both run on the rite's own table of precedence (band's 28-entry table), not RG 8's coarse four-class rank. Precedence.resolve now computes each commemoration candidate's own band value once, generically, and hands it to rules.admit as a third tuple element (Precedence.rules.admit's signature changed accordingly, ditto Precedence_ef.admit; every rule-record stub in the test suite updated to match). Precedence_ef.admit's own compare_dignity is replaced by compare_precedence, ordering by band then slug; a residual tie within one identical band value still falls back to slug, since RG 113 gives no further instruction there -- documented as a still-uncited engineering convention, not dressed up as a rubric. RG 98 ("in paritate autem Officium prius impeditum praecedit") was considered as a candidate authority for that residual and rejected: it governs the transfer queue order among several simultaneously-impeded I-class feasts (Caput XIII), a different operation in a different chapter from RG 113's commemoration admission (Caput XVI); nothing in the primary text connects the two. Blast radius measured against the pre-change binary across the entire 1583-9999 domain (not only 2005-2050): the admitted-commemoration-slug set is byte-identical, day for day, before and after this change. The fix corrects the citation and mechanism, not the answer, on this codebase's current data -- both of the task brief's named examples (22 Feb Chair-of-Peter/Lent-vs-Paul, 22 Sept Maurice-vs-Thomas-of- Villanova) are confirmed present and unchanged in both streams. A new test (RG113: admit picks by precedence order, not slug, when they disagree) proves admit actually consults the passed-in precedence value with a synthetic pair whose slug order and precedence order disagree -- teeth a same-band-only regression test could not have caught, since every real collision found in the domain happens to agree on both axes. 271 -> 272 tests, all green; COLITUR_EXHAUSTIVE_SWEEP=1 unaffected. --- test/test_calendar.ml | 5 ++++- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) (limited to 'test/test_calendar.ml') diff --git a/test/test_calendar.ml b/test/test_calendar.ml index 8770017..93cd0bb 100644 --- a/test/test_calendar.ml +++ b/test/test_calendar.ml @@ -82,7 +82,10 @@ module Fixture = struct test below a genuine Precedence-native omission (distinct from a deferred one) to exercise. *) let rules : (season, rank) P.rules = - { P.band; disposition; admit = (fun ~observed:_ ~temporal:_ cs -> List.filteri (fun i _ -> i < 1) cs) } + { P.band; disposition; + admit = + (fun ~observed:_ ~temporal:_ cs -> + List.filteri (fun i _ -> i < 1) cs |> List.map (fun (c, p, (_ : int)) -> (c, p))) } (* RG 96, generic form: search forward from the day after [origin] for the first day whose occupant is not "blocking" -- in this synthetic -- cgit v1.3