krino.git/internal/engine/match_test.go, branch v0.0.12rule-based file sorter in Go, shows the plan before touching anything, applies only the files you choose, and can undo any run, with s-expression rules and a GTK 4 windowhttps://git.labunix.xyz/krino.git/atom?h=v0.0.122026-09-17T10:11:42Zcomments that explain the code, not how it was written2026-09-17T10:11:42ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-17T10:11:42Zurn:sha1:bddbd74e4a73e8e32bcf648efd1cac5655f6d0cd
About 340 comments cited the development process: task and plan
numbers, fix waves, rulings, reviewers, and the author in the third
person with a date. None of that exists outside the work itself, so to
a reader it pointed at nothing. Each one now states the engineering
reason it was standing in front of; where a comment was provenance and
nothing else, it is gone.
References to docs/design.md and docs/gui-design.md by section stay:
both ship with the repository. The design documents lose their
amendment diaries - CHANGELOG.md is that record - and the GUI's says
plainly that the window has gone further than the document.
Only comments changed. Every .go file was parsed and its code printed
with comments stripped, before and after: the two hashes are identical
across all 175 files.
gui: name the other copy of a duplicate, and offer to keep this one instead2026-09-17T08:15:45ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-17T08:15:45Zurn:sha1:a2cb20851499e9c00bd3bf642680a9ce3148cae8a rule's duplicate check failure shortens the path too2026-09-14T22:33:04ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-14T22:33:04Zurn:sha1:eb31377e43fb26a6726b741978db83453fcd7bddduplicate warnings share one format2026-09-14T21:48:23ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-14T21:48:23Zurn:sha1:1bb5097986558ee7dd3aeaf8e7defefdf91ae4b6literal braces are text, not placeholders, for containment and walk exclusion2026-09-14T21:45:23ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-14T21:45:23Zurn:sha1:97c8164bc81e0a438dab92d7244485005dac4ff2krino: duplicates are found, never deleted2026-09-14T08:56:21ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-14T08:56:21Zurn:sha1:1506c7dcd6032c04c1df6f5785b6dd3dfe4511cc
A rule combining (duplicate) with a delete action is refused at load, and a
file that is a duplicate under any duplicate scope its directory uses gets no
delete step from any rule: the plan shows it skipped and the chain continues.
A failed duplicate check blocks the delete too. Tests cover (matched), another
rule's own condition, a test evaluation skipped, two scopes and a failed
check, each checking every copy is still on disk.
krino: matching — scan, ignore, conditions, extraction, duplicates, explain, dry run2026-09-11T23:22:12ZLukasz Kasprzaklukas@labunix.xyz2026-09-11T23:22:12Zurn:sha1:3b36a48b7ce5a53a9366f3b31f94311f178e2553