| Commit message (Collapse) | Author | Age | Files | Lines |
| ... | |
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lukasz, 2026-09-14: leave deleting duplicates to the user or jdupes. Section
5.5 now forbids a delete action in any rule using (duplicate), and skips any
delete step for a file that is a duplicate under a scope its directory uses,
which closes the (matched) and other-rule routes. Two scopes that elect
different originals can then only move copies aside, never delete them. The
consequences land in 4.5, 7.1, the 8.2 example, 15 and 17.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
README, changelog
Also: undo removes the directories its run created; a hardlink is never a
duplicate of its own other name; a flag written before "undo" is honoured;
--version prints no leading v. Duplicate conditions with different scopes
not sharing an original is documented as a known limitation.
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Lukasz: "no performance goal". Section 13s "under 2 s on a 4-core laptop" is
replaced with the decision and its evidence, so it is not reinstated later:
measured throughput is dominated by the external extractors, not by krino. A
real folder of 265 files with 164 needing pdftotext at roughly 80 ms each takes
12-17 s; a synthetic 4405-file tree needing no extraction takes 1.09 s. A single
threshold would describe popplers speed and the shape of one folder. The
measurement is still reported in the release notes; nothing is promised.
|
| | |
|
| | |
|
| |
|
|
| |
explain, dry run
|
| |
|