docs(ef): fix round 1 citation corrections in temporal_ef.ml (F5b, F6)

bvm_saturday_names's own comment: the "Missae de S. Maria in sabbato"
heading quote corrected from an overclaimed "both scans, word for word"
to showing both scans' own raw OCR (noisy, and genuinely differing in
abbreviation from each other) side by side, with the substance-only
corroboration stated plainly.

Colour citation tightened: RG 431(e) (the Missal's own classification
of this Mass as a "Missa votiva IV classis... de B. Maria Virg.") -> RG
121(a) (votive Masses take the colour of the feast-type they
correspond to) -> RG 120(b) (BVM feasts are white), replacing RG 120(b)
alone as the primary citation -- this Office is not itself a festum, so
RG 120(b)'s own "in Officio et Missa de festis" was a stretch as the
sole basis. Conclusion (white) unchanged.

1 files changed, 53 insertions, 24 deletions

diff --git a/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml b/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml
index 2188ce3..cf0d22c 100644
--- a/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml
+++ b/lib/rites/rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml
@@ -626,21 +626,42 @@ let weekday_word d = Date.weekday_to_string (Date.weekday d)
    liturgici IV classis: 27. Officium sanctae Mariae in sabbato. 28. Feriae
    IV classis." -- both scans, register §4).
 
-   Colour: white, ALWAYS, regardless of season -- RG 120(b) (Caput XVIII,
-   "De coloribus paramentorum", "B) De colore albo"), both photographic
-   scans: "120. Adhibetur color albus in Officio et Missa de festis: ... b)
-   B. Mariae Virg." -- white is used in the Office and Mass of feasts ... of
-   the Blessed Virgin Mary. NOT RG 119 (the "de Tempore" white rule for
-   Christmastide/Paschaltide) or RG 127/128 (season green/violet): this
-   Office is never "de Tempore" for colour purposes, so it overrides
-   [season_colour] unconditionally, including on Septuagesima (violet) and
-   Time-after-Epiphany/-Pentecost (green) Saturdays -- confirmed against the
-   oracle (missalemeum, 1 August 2026, a Time-after-Pentecost Saturday:
-   white, not the season's green). The Missal's own "Missae de sancta Maria
-   in sabbato" section (both scans) carries no per-Mass colour override the
-   way some other votive Masses do elsewhere in the same scan ("In hac Missa
-   adhibetur color albus") -- it needs none, RG 120(b) already settles it
-   unconditionally for every occurrence.
+   Colour: white, ALWAYS, regardless of season. CORRECTED, fix round 1
+   (coordinator finding F6): RG 120(b) alone is a stretch as the PRIMARY
+   citation -- its own text reads "in Officio et Missa DE FESTIS" (of
+   FEASTS), and this Office is not itself a festum (RG 91's own table
+   position, entry 27, sits outside the Festa rows 11-13/16/19/20/23/24
+   entirely). The tighter chain, found on the same scan: RG 431(e) (Caput
+   XX, "De hymno Gloria in excelsis") is the Missal's OWN classification of
+   this exact Mass, word for word: "431. Hymnus Gloria in excelsis
+   dicitur: ... e) in Missis votivis IV classis de Angelis, quocumque die,
+   et de B. Maria Virg. QUAE IN SABBATO CELEBRANTUR" -- the Gloria is said
+   "in IV-class VOTIVE MASSES of the Angels, on any day, and OF THE BVM
+   WHICH ARE CELEBRATED ON SATURDAY" -- the Missal's own words classify
+   this Mass as a "Missa votiva IV classis... de B. Maria Virg.", not a
+   festum. RG 121(a) (immediately after RG 120, same "De colore albo"
+   section), both photographic scans: "121. Colorem album requirunt
+   Missae votivae: a) quae respondent festis, de quibus numero
+   praecedenti" -- white colour is required by VOTIVE MASSES which
+   "correspond to" (respondent) the feasts named in the preceding
+   paragraph [120] -- 120(b)'s own "B. Mariae Virg." among them. The chain
+   -- RG 431(e) (this Mass IS a IV-class votive Mass of the BVM) -> RG
+   121(a) (a votive Mass corresponding to a 120-listed feast-type takes
+   that colour) -> RG 120(b) (BVM feasts are white) -- reaches the
+   identical conclusion (white) through the category the Missal's own text
+   actually places this Mass in (votive), not by treating it as a festum
+   RG 91's own table structure says it is not. NOT RG 119 (the "de
+   Tempore" white rule for Christmastide/Paschaltide) or RG 127/128
+   (season green/violet) either way: this Office is never "de Tempore" for
+   colour purposes, so it overrides [season_colour] unconditionally,
+   including on Septuagesima (violet) and Time-after-Epiphany/-Pentecost
+   (green) Saturdays -- confirmed against the oracle (missalemeum, 1
+   August 2026, a Time-after-Pentecost Saturday: white, not the season's
+   green). The Missal's own "Missae de sancta Maria in sabbato" section
+   (both scans) carries no further per-Mass colour override the way some
+   OTHER votive Masses do elsewhere in the same scan ("In hac Missa
+   adhibetur color albus") -- it needs none, the chain above already
+   settles it unconditionally for every occurrence.
 
    Name: "Officium sanctae Mariae in sabbato" -- RG 91 entry 27's own table
    title AND RG 79's own heading, both photographic scans and the electronic
@@ -689,15 +710,23 @@ let weekday_word d = Date.weekday_to_string (Date.weekday d)
    with no change to [Validate] at all, since season+week+weekday is already
    guaranteed unique within a liturgical year by construction. It also
    dovetails with the FIVE numbered "Missae de sancta Maria in sabbato" the
-   Missal's own Common of the BVM prints immediately afterward ("MISSAE DE
-   S. MARIA IN SABBATO QUAE DICI ETIAM POSSUNT ALIIS DIEBUS UT VOTIVAE DE B.
-   MARIA VIRGINE, IUXTA RUBRICAS VEL, EX INDULTO, PRO TEMPORUM DIVERSITATE":
-   I "Tempore Adventus", II "A Nativitate Domini usque ad Purificationem",
-   III "A die 3 Februarii usque ad feriam IV Hebdomadae sanctae", IV
-   "Tempore Paschali", V "A festo Ss. Trinitatis usque ad sabbatum ante
-   dominicam I Adventus" -- both photographic scans, word for word, matching
-   the oracle's own "V Mass of the B. V. M." title on a Time-after-Pentecost
-   Saturday): a season-keyed slug leaves room for a future lectionary
+   Missal's own Common of the BVM prints immediately afterward -- a heading
+   ("MISSAE DE S. MARIA IN SABBATO QUAE DICI ETIAM POSSUNT ALIIS DIEBUS UT
+   VOTIVAE DE B. MARIA VIRGINE, IUXTA RUBRICAS VEL, EX INDULTO, PRO TEMPORUM
+   DIVERSITATE") whose SUBSTANCE both scans corroborate but whose exact
+   wording is NOT "word for word" identical on both -- CORRECTED, fix round
+   1 (coordinator finding F5b): both scans' own OCR is noisy here, and the
+   two additionally use different abbreviations for each other ("S. MARIA"
+   vs "SANCTA MARIA", "B. MARIA VIRGINE" vs "BEATA MARIA VIRGINE"), not
+   merely different OCR artifacts of one underlying text -- the task
+   report has the full raw-OCR comparison. Followed by five numbered
+   Masses, each with its own season heading, clean and consistent on both
+   scans: I "Tempore Adventus", II "A Nativitate Domini usque ad
+   Purificationem", III "A die 3 Februarii usque ad feriam IV Hebdomadae
+   sanctae", IV "Tempore Paschali", V "A festo Ss. Trinitatis usque ad
+   sabbatum ante dominicam I Adventus" -- matching the oracle's own "V Mass
+   of the B. V. M." title on a Time-after-Pentecost Saturday: a
+   season-keyed slug leaves room for a future lectionary
    bootstrap (Plan 4) to map each one onto its corresponding numbered Mass's
    propers, the same way [sunday_slug]'s own season-keyed Sunday slugs
    already anchor the ordinary lectionary. RG 309(a)'s own words -- "Missae