fix(ef): the Assumption and St Lawrence vigils are violet (RG 128)

RG 128, transcribed in the rules register since 2026-08-11, gives violet to
"vigils of II and III class outside Paschaltide". The Vigil of the Assumption
(14 August, II class) carried White and the Vigil of St Lawrence (9 August,
III class) carried Red. Both are outside Paschaltide, so both are violet. The
Ascension's vigil is untouched: it is the one II-class vigil inside
Paschaltide and was already correctly white.

The rule had been sitting in the register, disagreeing with the shipped data,
since before the data was bootstrapped. It was invisible because colitur,
lectio and missalemeum all carried the same two wrong colours -- colitur was
bootstrapped from lectio, lectio's ini is generated from missalemeum, and
missalemeum uses Divinum Officium's data files. Three sources agreeing is one
source counted three times, and the differential and the oracle both went
green on the shared error. It surfaced only against witnesses outside that
tree: a published 1962 Ordo flagged the Assumption's, and O'Connell, The
Celebration of Mass 4th ed. (1964), section 4(c) and footnote 169, gave the
general rule and with it St Lawrence's, which the Ordo omits entirely.

Two golden pins added, in years where each vigil is actually observed rather
than impeded. The divergence this creates against every DO-lineage source is
cited in both allow-lists: C37 (lectio, 77 rows -- 92 possible minus 15 where
the vigil falls on a Sunday) and M29 (missalemeum, 3 rows in 2026-2027 and 2
in each of 2035 and 2038). Both gated on the exact slugs or dates and on
colour alone, so any other divergence on those days would still surface.

Also recorded, no code change: rose on Gaudete and Laetare stays. RG 131 is
permissive ("adhiberi possunt") and the Ordo prints violet, so the colour
field carries a permission rather than a requirement on those two Sundays a
year -- a decided position now, not an unexamined one.

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 0 deletions

diff --git a/data/ef/expected-divergences-missalemeum.sexp b/data/ef/expected-divergences-missalemeum.sexp
index 593edf9..84b4f25 100644
--- a/data/ef/expected-divergences-missalemeum.sexp
+++ b/data/ef/expected-divergences-missalemeum.sexp
@@ -298,3 +298,8 @@ CORRECTED, fix round 1 (coordinator review): the remaining 352 were previously d
  (verdict colitur)
  (note "Task 9 (branch ef-lectionary, layer-4 oracle): 25 December, both years. colitur: Heb 1:1-12/John 1:1-14 (\"Missa in die\"); missalemeum's own entry[0]: Titus 2:11-15/Luke 2:1-14 (\"Missa in nocte\"). Both are real, correct, Missal-verifiable citations for 25 December -- this is not a rubric dispute or a data gap either engine is wrong about, a comparator/fixture-extraction artefact (which of several equally-real Masses a multi-Mass day's own JSON array entry[0] happens to be). NOT fixed by changing the extractor's own array-index convention: that convention is deliberate and already verified, in the extraction script's own header, for every OTHER field this fixture reads on a multi-Mass day (rank/colours/tempora/commemorations/displaced, confirmed IDENTICAL across a day's own multiple Masses on all 4 such days, Christmas and All Souls, both years) -- only the CITATION fields are not identical across a day's own Masses, discovered by this task, and changing the index for citations alone while keeping it for everything else would be a second, undeclared convention, not a fix. Derived directly from the OCaml comparator's own failure output, not hand-counted first and cross-checked after: 2.")
  (expected_rows 2))
+ ((id M29)
+ (citation "RG 128, transcribed in docs/research/rules-register.md 3b: violet for vigils of II and III class outside Paschaltide. The Vigil of St Lawrence (9 August, III class) and the Vigil of the Assumption (14 August, II class) both qualify. missalemeum keeps red and white respectively. Corroborated against O'Connell, The Celebration of Mass, 4th ed. (1964, revised to the Codex Rubricarum 1960 and the 1962 Missal), section 4(c), whose footnote 169 names the sole exception -- the Ascension's vigil, inside Eastertide, white -- which colitur already emitted correctly")
+ (verdict colitur)
+ (note "ef-oconnell-rubrics branch. Unlike every other entry in this file, the oracle here is not an independent witness against colitur: it is colitur's own discarded ancestor. colitur was bootstrapped from lectio, lectio's ini is generated from missalemeum, and missalemeum uses Divinum Officium's data files, so all three carried the same two wrong colours and no layer sharing that lineage could see it (CLAUDE.md's own lineage note, register 6.20). The defect surfaced only against the Missal's own RG 128 -- transcribed in the register since 2026-08-11 and disagreeing with the shipped data all along -- plus O'Connell and a published 1962 Ordo. Same fix as C37 in the lectio differential, seen from the oracle side. 3 rows in this window: 2026-08-14, 2027-08-09, 2027-08-14. 2026-08-09 is absent because it is a Sunday that year and the vigil never occurs, checked with date -d. Gated on the exact dates and Colour_f alone, so any other divergence on these days would still surface unexplained.")
+ (expected_rows 3))