docs(rite-ef): correct a false band-value comparison in the RG16(a) comment

Fix round 1 review, MINOR finding (item 4). Both precedence_ef.ml and
test_precedence_ef.ml claimed the loser-side Class2 conjunct held because
'entry 6's own band value (6) is lower than every entry [3, 11-14]' --
false on its face (6 is not lower than 3) and, worse, the claim proves the
opposite of what it was cited for: if a band-3 candidate really did
contest a Class1 Sunday, the lower number would win, meaning the Sunday
would lose, not beat it as claimed.

The conclusion itself was never wrong, only the justification. Against
entries 11-14 (sanctoral-origin Lord feasts) the numeric argument holds
(6 < 11-14). Against entry 3 (Epiphany, Ascension, Trinity, Corpus
Christi, Sacred Heart, Christ the King) it is not numeric at all but
structural: every band-3 celebration is temporal-origin, and
Precedence.resolve takes exactly one temporal candidate per day, so a
band-3 Lord feast IS that date's own single temporal candidate, never a
second one contesting a separately-produced Sunday -- there is no band
comparison to make in the first place. Comment-only; no behaviour change.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions