docs: three comments that outlived the rules they described

All three are the project's own "correct code, wrong explanation" shape,
found by the final review of the RG 113 work. No behaviour change.

test_rite_ef.ml's registered Alcotest label said "Thomas of Villanova
observed, Maurice commemorated" while the test asserts the Ember
Wednesday is observed, Thomas is the sole commemoration and Maurice is
omitted -- the opposite of two of its three assertions. The body's own
doc comment was right; only the name a test run prints was wrong.

validate.ml's lead-in still said origin is reconstructed as Sanctoral
uniformly because the EF admit "reads only rank and slug, never origin".
That stopped being true in ea22ad2: admit now orders by band, and band
reads origin via is_temporal, so a temporal-origin commemoration
relabelled Sanctoral would be scored on the wrong table entry. The code
below already recovers the origin exactly; only this comment lagged.

precedence_ef.ml's band guard justified itself by citing
celebration.mli as saying a demoted feast retains its rank for RG 111's
admission-COUNT purposes. celebration.mli says the opposite -- it names
the ORDERING use the guard removes. The guard is right for a reason it
did not give: rank stays load-bearing through RG 111(b)'s "de festo II
classis" floor, which is what excludes these entries from a II-class
Sunday's slot. Both the citation and celebration.mli's own now-stale
line are corrected, each recording what it previously claimed.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions