rite(ef): the Annunciation's RG96 exception is conditional, not unconditional

The register was transcribed faithfully but was itself wrong: RG 96's
Attamen (a), primary-source-verified from the scans and now corrected
in the register, reads 'festum Annuntiationis B. Mariae Virg., quando
est transferendum post Pascha, transfertur ... in feriam II post
dominicam in albis' -- the Monday-after-Low-Sunday seat applies ONLY
'quando est transferendum post Pascha', when the feast is to be
transferred PAST EASTER. The unconditional transcription made the
exception fire on every impeded Annunciation regardless of cause.

transfer_target now computes the general RG 96 target first, for every
candidate, and overrides to the Monday after Low Sunday only when that
general target itself falls after Easter Sunday -- testing the rubric's
own condition directly rather than re-deriving a date-proximity rule
from first principles.

Confirmed against three real years the review named: 2007, 2012 and
2057 all previously sent the Annunciation to Easter + 8 (16 April,
16 April, 30 April respectively) when the correct, now-produced target
is the next free day before Easter (26 March in each case -- Passion
Sunday in 2007/2012, Lent III Sunday in 2057). Verified with actual CLI
output for all three, before and after.

Also cites RG 96 Attamen (b), the same primary-source passage, as the
direct authority for All Souls' own move to the following Monday when
impeded by a Sunday -- previously inferred from RG 91 entry 8's
parenthetical plus the general walk, which happened to produce the
right date; now stated directly.

Rewrote the two existing Annunciation unit tests, whose synthetic
occupants no longer trigger the (now correctly conditional) exception,
and added a 2057 regression test using the real Temporal_ef.temporal as
occupant plus a real-data cram pin -- both mutation-verified against
the unconditional reading.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions