fix(ef): days within the Octave of the Nativity, and RG 69 for 29-31 Dec

M11 was the one entry in the missalemeum allow-list adjudicated against
colitur, and it was right to be. The calendarium directs "Com. octavae
Nativitatis" under each of 26, 27 and 28 December (LT.txt:5454-5459) and
RG 109(c) makes a commemoration of the days within the Octave privileged.
colitur emitted none.

The cause was a reasoning error stated in Temporal_ef's own comment:
"26-28 Dec are Stephen, John and the Innocents, hence sanctoral". Their
office is sanctoral -- those II-class feasts win the day -- but they
remain days WITHIN the Octave (RG 67, "Dies infra octavam sunt II
classis"), and colitur built them as generic Class4 ferias. With no
octave-day candidate there was nothing for the feast to be commemorated
over. Building days 2-4 exactly as days 5-7 always were makes the
commemoration fall out of the existing machinery rather than needing a
special case: the feast wins on rank, the octave day loses, RG 109(c)
privileges it, RG 111(c)'s single slot goes to it.

A second, independent defect surfaced while fixing it. The octave-day
branch covered 29-31 December unconditionally, so a Sunday falling there
got a feria identity -- where RG 69 says a Sunday occurring 26-31
December SEMPER keeps its own office and commemorates the feast.
Confirmed against the oracle rather than argued: missalemeum shows
"Sunday in the Octave of Christmas" on 2035-12-30, a Sunday, where
colitur showed a feria. Both named and anchors now exclude Sundays;
anchors had asserted the octave slugs unconditionally and was wrong the
same way.

Blast radius, full sweep against the pre-change binary: 25251 days, every
one 26-31 December, exactly two shapes, zero unclassified -- 21653
carrying an octave-day slug and 3598 that are all Sundays, the RG 69
correction.

Allow-lists: M11 closed and removed. C6 narrowed 138 to 119, nineteen of
its days having changed temporal identity rather than verdict. M15
widened 18 to 22 -- both streams now commemorate the octave, but the
candidate is temporal-origin and carries no English name to match against
missalemeum's own, this entry's documented limit on four more dates.

Stated rather than glossed: this trades a substantive divergence, colitur
omitting a commemoration the Missal directs, for a comparator limit, the
commemoration existing but not being name-matchable. That is a real
improvement, but what the oracle now proves is that both streams
commemorate something on those days; the identity rests on the rubric and
the calendarium.

Register: section 6.17.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions