docs(C39): withdraw the Ordo corroboration claim

C39 and the 2025 golden pin both claimed the published Ordo independently
confirms RG 33's third trigger, because it omits St Lawrence's vigil on
2025-08-09 where lectio and missalemeum keep it.

It does not. The Ordo omits that vigil on 2027-08-09 as well, where the
clause says to keep it (10 August is a Tuesday, the feast holds its day),
and 2026-08-09 is a Sunday where the rule's first trigger omits it anyway.
The 2024 date has no row. So the Ordo never shows St Lawrence's vigil on
any date it covers, and the 2025 agreement is a blanket gap coinciding with
the right answer, not evidence.

The rule itself is unaffected: it rests on RG 33's text, which admits no
latitude, and on lectio not evaluating the clause at all -- "RG 33" appears
nowhere in its production code, and the third trigger cannot emerge from
per-day rank comparison because it turns on what is observed the following
day. The divergence is architectural, not a disagreement about the rubric.

Recorded rather than deleted: the withdrawn claim is why this entry was
first written up as unusually well corroborated.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions