diff options
| author | Lukasz Kasprzak <lukas@labunix.xyz> | 2026-08-22 22:40:07 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Lukasz Kasprzak <lukas@labunix.xyz> | 2026-08-22 22:40:07 +0200 |
| commit | 761ae859d73660bcfaa59581312989cb942e704d (patch) | |
| tree | adcf7aa53f104fd753769445ced043946d6f0927 /test/test_precedence.ml | |
| parent | 9c96e0afc19925b651e0dfee3bc9182dee72acf0 (diff) | |
| download | colitur-761ae859d73660bcfaa59581312989cb942e704d.tar.gz colitur-761ae859d73660bcfaa59581312989cb942e704d.zip | |
feat(ef): RG 111(a), the sung-Mass commemoration cap
Item 1 of Phase 3 (celebrant-rubrics-phase1): the "at Low Mass"
commemoration-placement rule the design spec recorded as unread. It is
not a new rule -- it is the sung/low axis of RG 111, which colitur
already implements.
RG 111(a) (LT.txt, "Ratio admittendi commemorationes"): a liturgical
day of the first class, AND any non-conventual sung Mass regardless of
the day's own class, admits at most one commemoration, and only if it
is privileged. (b)/(c)/(d), the same rubric's remaining clauses, give
the wider caps colitur's admit already computes -- which is exactly
the LOW MASS answer.
Exposed as Precedence.sung_mass_commemorations, a pure derivation over
the existing Low-Mass admitted list (filter to Privileged, keep the
first), not a new stored field on Liturgical_day.t: the input list is
already validated and privilege-tagged, so a second field would only
create a second place for the same fact to drift out of sync with the
first, with no new information gained. Liturgical_day.t.commemorations
is now documented as the Low Mass set explicitly, removing the
ambiguity its .mli previously left unstated.
Tested against synthetic Low-Mass sets (none/one/two privileged,
already-first, empty) and two real calendar days resolved through the
normal Cal.day pipeline: 2026-08-14 (Vigil of the Assumption, an
ordinary-only commemoration, dropped at Sung Mass) and 2026-04-25 (the
Major Litanies, RG 80/109(f), privileged, kept at both Masses).
Diffstat (limited to 'test/test_precedence.ml')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/test_precedence.ml | 55 |
1 files changed, 54 insertions, 1 deletions
diff --git a/test/test_precedence.ml b/test/test_precedence.ml index acc89fc..54ab3f9 100644 --- a/test/test_precedence.ml +++ b/test/test_precedence.ml @@ -98,6 +98,49 @@ let test_temporal_only_day () = Alcotest.(check int) "nothing deferred" 0 (List.length r.P.deferred); Alcotest.(check int) "nothing omitted" 0 (List.length r.P.omitted) +(* RG 111(a): sung_mass_commemorations -- see precedence.mli's own citation. + Pure function, no {!resolve} needed: exercised directly against + hand-built Low-Mass admitted lists, the same shape {!P.resolve} would + produce, rather than through a full resolution. *) +let sung_test_cand rank slug = cand ~rank slug + +let test_sung_mass_no_privileged () = + let low_mass = [ (sung_test_cand Lo "a", P.Ordinary); (sung_test_cand Lo "b", P.Ordinary) ] in + Alcotest.(check (list string)) "no privileged commemoration -> sung Mass keeps none" [] + (List.map (fun (c, _) -> slug_of c) (P.sung_mass_commemorations low_mass)) + +let test_sung_mass_one_privileged () = + let low_mass = + [ (sung_test_cand Lo "ordinary-one", P.Ordinary); (sung_test_cand Hi "privileged-one", P.Privileged) ] + in + Alcotest.(check (list string)) "the ordinary commemoration is dropped, the privileged one kept" + [ "privileged-one" ] + (List.map (fun (c, _) -> slug_of c) (P.sung_mass_commemorations low_mass)) + +let test_sung_mass_privileged_first_already () = + let low_mass = + [ (sung_test_cand Hi "privileged-one", P.Privileged); (sung_test_cand Lo "ordinary-one", P.Ordinary) ] + in + Alcotest.(check (list string)) "a privileged commemoration already first is kept alone" [ "privileged-one" ] + (List.map (fun (c, _) -> slug_of c) (P.sung_mass_commemorations low_mass)) + +let test_sung_mass_empty_low_mass_set () = + Alcotest.(check (list string)) "an empty Low-Mass set stays empty at Sung Mass" [] + (List.map (fun (c, _) -> slug_of c) (P.sung_mass_commemorations [])) + +(* If two privileged commemorations were ever admitted together (not known + to occur on any shipped rite's data -- precedence.mli's own citation), + [sung_mass_commemorations] keeps only the FIRST -- input order is + already RG 113 precedence order, so this is "the highest-precedence + privileged entry survives", not an arbitrary truncation. *) +let test_sung_mass_two_privileged_keeps_first () = + let low_mass = + [ (sung_test_cand Hi "first-privileged", P.Privileged); (sung_test_cand Hi "second-privileged", P.Privileged) ] + in + Alcotest.(check (list string)) "only the first (higher-precedence) privileged commemoration survives" + [ "first-privileged" ] + (List.map (fun (c, _) -> slug_of c) (P.sung_mass_commemorations low_mass)) + let suite = ( "Precedence", [ Alcotest.test_case "highest band wins" `Quick test_highest_band_wins; @@ -107,4 +150,14 @@ let suite = test_commemoration_only_never_observed; Alcotest.test_case "nothing silently lost" `Quick test_nothing_silently_lost; Alcotest.test_case "order independent" `Quick test_order_independent; - Alcotest.test_case "temporal-only day" `Quick test_temporal_only_day ] ) + Alcotest.test_case "temporal-only day" `Quick test_temporal_only_day; + Alcotest.test_case "RG 111(a): sung Mass, no privileged commemoration" `Quick + test_sung_mass_no_privileged; + Alcotest.test_case "RG 111(a): sung Mass keeps the one privileged commemoration" `Quick + test_sung_mass_one_privileged; + Alcotest.test_case "RG 111(a): sung Mass, privileged already first" `Quick + test_sung_mass_privileged_first_already; + Alcotest.test_case "RG 111(a): sung Mass, empty Low-Mass set" `Quick + test_sung_mass_empty_low_mass_set; + Alcotest.test_case "RG 111(a): sung Mass keeps only the first of two privileged" `Quick + test_sung_mass_two_privileged_keeps_first ] ) |
