1 files changed, 88 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/data/ef/adjustments.sexp b/data/ef/adjustments.sexp
index 740180c..a5e7c6f 100644
--- a/data/ef/adjustments.sexp
+++ b/data/ef/adjustments.sexp
@@ -165,6 +165,87 @@
 ; (Commemoration_only entries are never the OBSERVED celebration, so this
 ; entry's OWN colour is never printed by the current pipeline, the same
 ; note `Edit eusebius-confessor` above makes for its own colour field).
+;
+; `Add major-litanies` -- NEW (ef-major-litanies task). RG 80 (Caput X, "De
+; Litaniis maioribus et minoribus", §A "De Litaniis maioribus"; all three
+; primary documents -- both photographic scans AND the electronic
+; transcription -- word for word, no divergence to adjudicate): "80.
+; Litaniae maiores assignatae sunt diei 25 aprilis; si vero eo die
+; occurrit dominica Paschatis vel feria II post Pascha, transferuntur in
+; sequentem feriam III." RG 81, same division: "81. De Litaniis maioribus
+; nihil fit in Officio, sed tantum in Missa. Earum autem commemoratio non
+; est habenda commemoratio 'de Tempore'." RG 109(f) (Caput XVI, "De
+; Commemorationibus"): "f) de Litaniis maioribus, in Missa" -- a
+; privileged commemoration. The calendarium's own April table (all three
+; documents, e.g. the transcription: "iv c vii 25 Litania Maior. - S.
+; MARCI EVANGELISTAE, II classis.") prints "Litania Maior" as part of 25
+; April's own descriptive line, alongside St Mark, not as a second,
+; separately class-numbered row -- corroborating RG 81's "nihil fit in
+; Officio" the same way Maurice's own "Commemoratio ... " line (no class
+; number) corroborates a demoted feast elsewhere in this project (see
+; precedence_ef.ml's [band], top-of-function guard).
+;
+; MODELLING DECISION: `Commemoration_only`, `Fixed(4, 25)`, the same shape
+; as `commemoration-of-st-peter` above -- because RG 81 denies the
+; Litanies any Office standing at all ("nihil fit in Officio"), so they
+; can never be the OBSERVED day (RG 91's table enumerates "dies
+; liturgici", Office days, and this is explicitly none), only ever a Mass
+; commemoration. `Precedence_ef.disposition`/`.privilege_of` wire RG
+; 109(f)'s privilege and RG 80's own transfer condition (both cited in
+; full at `Precedence_ef.major_litanies_slug` and its two call sites); see
+; that module for the reasoning and precedence_ef.ml's own comments for
+; why the transfer reuses the existing RG 96 placement machinery
+; ({!Colitur_kernel.Precedence.Transfer}) rather than new machinery.
+;
+; `rank Class4`: RG 91's Table of Precedence has NO row for the Major
+; Litanies at all (RG 81 denies them Office standing; the calendarium's
+; own printed line above confirms it), so there is no class this data
+; field could faithfully report -- the same situation `band`'s own
+; top-of-function guard already documents for every `Commemoration_only`
+; entry ("never had a row in the table for that occasion to begin with").
+; `Class4` is chosen as the lowest/inertest value available, deliberately
+; NOT `Class1` (which would make `Precedence_ef.privilege_of`'s branch (b),
+; "of a I-class day", grant this entry Privileged status for the WRONG
+; cited reason, silently making the (f) branch this task wires dead code
+; again). `band` ignores rank entirely for any `Commemoration_only`
+; candidate (checked first, unconditionally); `admit`'s only rank-keyed
+; test for an ordinary (non-privileged) II-class-Sunday commemoration
+; never applies here either, since this entry is always Privileged. No
+; live behavioural consequence either way -- recorded as a deliberate,
+; honestly-flagged placeholder, not a citation.
+;
+; `colour Violet`: NOT independently scan-verified for this specific
+; entry (out of this task's scope -- Mass propers are Plan 4, `citations`
+; stays `()`). Matches, by internal consistency, the colour this same
+; codebase already assigns the sibling Minor Litanies/Rogation days
+; (`rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml`'s own Rogation branch: `~colour:Colour.Violet`
+; for RG 87's Monday/Tuesday before Ascension) -- both are "Litaniae",
+; major and minor, sharing the same penitential/processional character;
+; RG 80/81/109(f) themselves say nothing about colour. Inert today
+; regardless (`Commemoration_only` entries are never OBSERVED, so this
+; field is never printed by the current pipeline -- the same note `Edit
+; eusebius-confessor` above makes for its own colour field).
+;
+; `subject Saint`: no clean fit among {Lord, Bvm, Saint, Temporal} -- the
+; Litanies are tied to no particular Divine Person or to the BVM (RG 80/81
+; name no one), and are far from an ordinary saint's feast either, but
+; `Subject.Temporal` is reserved for the temporal cycle's OWN office
+; (`subject.mli`), which this Fixed, sanctoral-origin entry structurally
+; is not. `Saint` is the same "no special exclusion applies" default this
+; codebase's own other `Commemoration_only` sanctoral entries already use
+; (RG 110's own Peter/Paul companion entries, `commemoration-of-st-peter`
+; immediately below) -- its only live behavioural consequence anywhere in
+; this codebase, RG 112(a)/(d)'s Lord/BVM mutual-exclusion rules, is one
+; this entry should NOT trigger either way, so `Saint` is safe as well as
+; consistent.
+;
+; `names`: English ("The Major Litanies") is a plain translation of RG
+; 80's own "Litaniae maiores", not independently primary-sourced (no
+; English title exists in any of the three documents, all Latin). Polish
+; ("Litanie Większe") likewise a plain vernacular rendering, not verified
+; against any external Polish liturgical reference -- flagged here rather
+; than presented as sourced, the same honesty this file's own
+; `commemoration-of-st-peter` entry gives its own colour field above.
 ((id ef-adjustments)
   (directives
     ((Suppress vigil-of-christmas)
@@ -177,4 +258,11 @@
               (names
                 ((en "St. Peter") (pl "\197\155w. Piotra, Aposto\197\130a")))
               (rank Class3) (status Commemoration_only) (colour Red)
+              (subject Saint) (citations ()) (layer ef-universal)))))
+      (Add
+        ((date (Fixed (month 4) (day 25)))
+          (cel
+            ((slug major-litanies)
+              (names ((en "The Major Litanies") (pl "Litanie Większe")))
+              (rank Class4) (status Commemoration_only) (colour Violet)
               (subject Saint) (citations ()) (layer ef-universal))))))))