diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'test')
| -rw-r--r-- | test/test_golden.ml | 18 |
1 files changed, 11 insertions, 7 deletions
diff --git a/test/test_golden.ml b/test/test_golden.ml index 14fbec4..ba25d8a 100644 --- a/test/test_golden.ml +++ b/test/test_golden.ml @@ -1363,13 +1363,17 @@ let test_vigil_of_st_lawrence_is_violet_2027 () = freed IV-class Saturday, which is why this pin reads white and subject=bvm. St Romanus keeps his commemoration either way (RG 111). - NOT independently witnessed, and an earlier version of this comment wrongly - said it was. The published Ordo does omit the vigil on this date -- but it - also omits it on 2027-08-09, where this clause says to KEEP it, so it never - shows St Lawrence's vigil at all in the years it covers and cannot - corroborate anything here. This pin rests on RG 33's own text and on the - fact that lectio never evaluates the clause (it appears nowhere in its - production code); see C39's own note in + INDEPENDENTLY WITNESSED at the day level, though not by the Ordo this + project already had. That one (extraordinaryform.org) omits the vigil here + AND on 2027-08-09 where the clause says to keep it, so it never shows St + Laurence's vigil at all and corroborates nothing -- a claim an earlier + version of this comment got wrong in both directions before checking. + The Latin Mass Society Ordo 2024-2025 for England and Wales does the job: + 9 August 2025 is "OUR LADY on SATURDAY IV Cl W / Commem of St Romanus M", + no vigil, and 10 August is the II-class Sunday with St Laurence reduced to + a commemoration -- this pin's exact content. It is discriminating because + that edition lists six other vigils as the day's office, including the + Assumption's on 14 August 2025. See C39's own note in data/ef/expected-divergences.sexp. *) let test_rg33_vigil_omitted_when_its_feast_is_commemorated_2025 () = check |