1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
|
; data/ef/adjustments.sexp -- hand-authored overlay over data/ef/sanctoral.sexp
; (Task 11). NOT generated by tools/bootstrap_sanctoral.ml -- edit directly.
;
; Suppresses `vigil-of-christmas` (24 Dec, data/ef/sanctoral.sexp, lectio's
; own bootstrapped entry): it is the SAME celebration as colitur's temporal
; cycle's own `ef-nativity-vigil` (rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml's [named], also 24
; Dec, RG 91 entry 5), not a second, distinct one. Once the sanctoral layer
; is live, that date would otherwise carry two candidates for one feast.
; Recorded as an Overlay directive rather than filtered out of the bootstrap
; or special-cased in code, per the task brief -- an auditable, diagnosable
; removal (Overlay.apply's own diagnostic fires if this slug is ever absent,
; e.g. after a re-bootstrap that renames it), not a silent drop.
;
; RG16(a) task (docs/research/rules-register.md §6.0): corrects one of
; data/ef/sanctoral.sexp's six `(subject Lord)` entries, inherited unchecked
; from lectio's own `class = lord` field (tridentine-calendar.ini) --
; `most-holy-name-of-mary` (12 Sep): calendarium line "Sanctissimi Nominis
; Mariae, III classis" -- "Nominis Mariae", the Name of MARY, not of the
; Lord, with no counter-evidence found anywhere (the "D. N. I. C." formula
; the genuinely Lord-tagged entries carry, e.g. 6 Aug "IN TRANSFIGURATIONE
; D. N. I. C.", is simply absent here, and nothing else in the calendarium
; suggests otherwise). This tag has no behavioural effect either way today
; ({!Precedence_ef.band}'s entry 14, the only place [subject] is tested for
; a II-class candidate, requires [Class2]; this entry is [Class3]) -- kept
; for the data's own accuracy, not because anything currently reads it.
;
; The tag [Bvm] itself carries no further systematic meaning in this
; codebase beyond "not Lord" -- after this correction it exists on exactly
; this one entry, while every other Marian feast (the Assumption, the
; Immaculate Conception, the Nativity of the BVM, ...) stays `(subject
; Saint)`. Nothing reads [Bvm] specifically; {!Subject.t}'s four-way split
; is not fully exercised by this codebase's own logic, only [Lord] is.
;
; RG16(a) task, fix round 1 (CRITICAL finding, reverted): a companion Edit
; here previously also retagged `purification-of-the-blessed-virgin-mary`
; (2 Feb) to [Bvm], on the same calendarium-title argument ("B. Mariae
; Virg.", not "D. N. I. C."). REVERTED -- the user has ruled: follow the
; oracle. missalemeum (this project's designated EF oracle) treats the
; Purification as taking an occurring II-class Sunday's place OUTRIGHT, with
; NO commemoration of the Sunday (`2020-02-02`, `2014-02-02`: title
; "Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary", `"commemorations": []`),
; exactly RG 16(a)'s own "festum Domini" treatment -- and NOT the treatment
; it gives an ordinary Marian feast on a Sunday (`2019-09-08`, the Nativity
; of the BVM: title "XIII Sunday after Pentecost", the FEAST demoted to a
; commemoration, the Sunday observed -- the opposite pattern). Genuine
; primary-text counter-evidence for the Marian reading remains on record
; (RG 120(b): the white-colour rule groups 2 February under "B. Mariae
; Virg.", a SEPARATE category from "Domini" -- register §6.0 quotes it in
; full), so the calendarium TITLE and the oracle's BEHAVIOUR disagree here;
; the user's ruling resolves that disagreement in the oracle's favour for
; this codebase's own purposes, not by declaring the calendarium argument
; wrong. See register §6.0 for the full account of both sides.
((id ef-adjustments)
(directives
((Suppress vigil-of-christmas)
(Edit most-holy-name-of-mary ((Set_subject Bvm))))))
|
