path: root/data/ef/adjustments.sexp

; data/ef/adjustments.sexp -- hand-authored overlay over data/ef/sanctoral.sexp
; (Task 11). NOT generated by tools/bootstrap_sanctoral.ml -- edit directly.
;
; Suppresses `vigil-of-christmas` (24 Dec, data/ef/sanctoral.sexp, lectio's
; own bootstrapped entry): it is the SAME celebration as colitur's temporal
; cycle's own `ef-nativity-vigil` (rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml's [named], also 24
; Dec, RG 91 entry 5), not a second, distinct one. Once the sanctoral layer
; is live, that date would otherwise carry two candidates for one feast.
; Recorded as an Overlay directive rather than filtered out of the bootstrap
; or special-cased in code, per the task brief -- an auditable, diagnosable
; removal (Overlay.apply's own diagnostic fires if this slug is ever absent,
; e.g. after a re-bootstrap that renames it), not a silent drop.
;
; RG16(a) task (docs/research/rules-register.md §6.0): corrects one of
; data/ef/sanctoral.sexp's six `(subject Lord)` entries, inherited unchecked
; from lectio's own `class = lord` field (tridentine-calendar.ini) --
; `most-holy-name-of-mary` (12 Sep): calendarium line "Sanctissimi Nominis
; Mariae, III classis" -- "Nominis Mariae", the Name of MARY, not of the
; Lord, with no counter-evidence found anywhere (the "D. N. I. C." formula
; the genuinely Lord-tagged entries carry, e.g. 6 Aug "IN TRANSFIGURATIONE
; D. N. I. C.", is simply absent here, and nothing else in the calendarium
; suggests otherwise). This tag has no behavioural effect either way today
; ({!Precedence_ef.band}'s entry 14, the only place [subject] is tested for
; a II-class candidate, requires [Class2]; this entry is [Class3]) -- kept
; for the data's own accuracy, not because anything currently reads it.
;
; The tag [Bvm] itself carries no further systematic meaning in this
; codebase beyond "not Lord" -- after this correction it exists on exactly
; this one entry, while every other Marian feast (the Assumption, the
; Immaculate Conception, the Nativity of the BVM, ...) stays `(subject
; Saint)`. Nothing reads [Bvm] specifically; {!Subject.t}'s four-way split
; is not fully exercised by this codebase's own logic, only [Lord] is.
;
; RG16(a) task, fix round 1 (CRITICAL finding, reverted): a companion Edit
; here previously also retagged `purification-of-the-blessed-virgin-mary`
; (2 Feb) to [Bvm], on the same calendarium-title argument ("B. Mariae
; Virg.", not "D. N. I. C."). REVERTED -- the user has ruled: follow the
; oracle. missalemeum (this project's designated EF oracle) treats the
; Purification as taking an occurring II-class Sunday's place OUTRIGHT, with
; NO commemoration of the Sunday (`2020-02-02`, `2014-02-02`: title
; "Purification of the Blessed Virgin Mary", `"commemorations": []`),
; exactly RG 16(a)'s own "festum Domini" treatment -- and NOT the treatment
; it gives an ordinary Marian feast on a Sunday (`2019-09-08`, the Nativity
; of the BVM: title "XIII Sunday after Pentecost", the FEAST demoted to a
; commemoration, the Sunday observed -- the opposite pattern). Genuine
; primary-text counter-evidence for the Marian reading remains on record
; (RG 120(b): the white-colour rule groups 2 February under "B. Mariae
; Virg.", a SEPARATE category from "Domini" -- register §6.0 quotes it in
; full), so the calendarium TITLE and the oracle's BEHAVIOUR disagree here;
; the user's ruling resolves that disagreement in the oracle's favour for
; this codebase's own purposes, not by declaring the calendarium argument
; wrong. See register §6.0 for the full account of both sides.
;
; ef-rebootstrap (2026-08-12): both directives re-examined against the
; regenerated source (tridentine-calendar.ini, SHA-256 1b303ef2...), which
; independently fixed several of the same defects this file was written to
; patch. Neither directive was removed -- reasoning below, per the task's
; own instruction to decide deliberately rather than delete on sight.
;
; `Edit most-holy-name-of-mary` -- the base bootstrap no longer needs this
; correction: the regenerated INI's own `[most-holy-name-of-mary]` section
; has DROPPED its `class = lord` field entirely (confirmed by direct grep
; against the source), so `tools/bootstrap_sanctoral.ml`'s `parse_subject`
; now falls through to its own default, `Subject.Saint` -- not `Lord` --
; before this overlay ever runs. Checked what {!Overlay.apply}'s [Edit]
; actually does with a directive whose target slug is present but whose
; field is no longer wrong, rather than assuming: [Edit] has no notion of
; "already correct" -- it looks up the slug, and if found (as this one
; still is) unconditionally folds every field_edit over the current value,
; firing NO diagnostic either way (overlay.ml's [apply_directive], the
; [Edit] branch: the only diagnostic is "slug not present", never "already
; matches"). So this is not a no-op: it still forces `Saint -> Bvm` on
; every run, identically to before, just starting from a different base
; value than it used to. Decision: KEEP, for two independent reasons, not
; one -- (1) DATA PRECISION, unaffected by the base bootstrap's own fix:
; the calendarium's "Sanctissimi Nominis Mariae" title names Mary
; specifically, so [Bvm] remains the more accurate tag than the generic
; [Saint] default, on the same textual grounds as the original entry
; above, regardless of what lectio's own `class` field happens to say this
; week. (2) REGRESSION DEFENCE: because [Set_subject] is unconditional, it
; also now stands as a guard against `class = lord` ever being
; RE-introduced for this slug by a future lectio regeneration -- the
; overlay would still force the result away from [Lord] (the one subject
; value {!Precedence_ef.band}'s RG 16(a) branch behaviourally reads),
; rather than silently letting a re-introduced bootstrap defect through.
; Removing the directive now would trade a currently-harmless redundancy
; for the loss of that guard.
;
; `Suppress vigil-of-christmas` -- re-verified, not assumed: `[vigil-of-
; christmas]` (24 Dec) is still present, unchanged, in both the
; regenerated INI and the regenerated `data/ef/sanctoral.sexp` (still the
; same duplicate of `rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml`'s own `ef-nativity-vigil`
; this directive was written to remove), so `Layer.mem` still finds it and
; {!Overlay.apply}'s [Suppress] branch still fires its ordinary
; slug-present path (no diagnostic) exactly as before. Nothing about this
; regeneration touched the reason this directive exists; kept unchanged.
;
; `Edit eusebius-confessor` -- NEW (ef-rebootstrap fix round 1, F3): this
; new entry's own bootstrapped colour, `Red`, is a LECTIO DATA DEFECT,
; found by checking the primary scan directly rather than trusting lectio's
; ini or missalemeum's own `:r` colour tag, which agree with each other but
; not with the Missal -- exactly the "two non-primary witnesses agreeing
; against the primary text" trap this project's own transcription-audit
; task already named once. `missale-romanum-1962.pdf`, 14 August, the
; commemoration's own proper: *"Eodem die 14 augusti / S. Eusebii Conf. /
; Commemoratio / Missa Iustus, ut in festo S. Pauli primi Eremitae, die 15
; ianuarii..."* -- "Conf." (Confessor, not Martyr), and the borrowed Mass
; "Iustus" is the SAME Mass 15 January's own St Paul the First Hermit uses
; -- a Confessor, white in both lectio's own data and colitur's
; (`paul-the-first-hermit`, `data/ef/sanctoral.sexp`) -- for the Common of
; Confessors. Corroborated negatively: lectio gives WHITE to every other
; Confessor/Abbot commemoration in its own data (`maur-abbot`, `giles`,
; `remigius`, `didacus`, `ubaldus`, `hilarion`, `sabbas`, `silvester`,
; `alexis`) -- Eusebius Confessor is the one exception, with no textual
; support found for it. No behavioural impact today (`Commemoration_only`
; entries are never the OBSERVED celebration, so this colour is never
; printed by the current pipeline -- but `Record`/rendering will read it
; the moment a template does), fixed for the data's own accuracy via the
; SAME overlay mechanism as the other two directives, since
; `data/ef/sanctoral.sexp` is generated and the source is upstream. Logged
; as a lectio-side generator/data defect in docs/research/rules-register.md
; for a future generator fix, not merely patched here silently.
;
; `Add commemoration-of-st-peter` -- NEW (ef-holyname-rg110 task, RG 110).
; A genuine DATA GAP in lectio's own source, not merely a colitur bootstrap
; miss: `~/git/projects/lectio/internal/caldata/tridentine-calendar.ini` has
; no 30 June entry for this at all (checked directly, `grep -n '30 June'`
; equivalent), so there is nothing for `tools/bootstrap_sanctoral.ml` to
; have picked up even correctly. RG 110's own text (docs/research/rules-
; register.md §4, Caput XIV): "In Officio et Missa S. Petri semper fit
; commemoratio S. Pauli, ET VICISSIM" -- in the Office and Mass of EITHER
; Peter or Paul, a commemoration of the OTHER is always made -- confirmed a
; THIRD time by the calendarium's own June table, BOTH photographic scans,
; word for word: "In Commemoratione S. Pauli Ap., III classis. /
; Commemoratio S. Petri Ap." -- exactly the SAME pattern already present in
; the base bootstrap for the other two RG 110 pairs (25 January's
; `conversion-of-st-paul` + `peter`; 22 February's `chair-of-st-peter` +
; `paul`), just missing here. `Precedence_ef.admit`'s own RG 110 mechanism
; (precedence_ef.ml) looks this slug up by name whenever
; `in-commemoratione-sancti-pauli-apostoli` is the day's own observed office
; -- a distinct slug from `peter` (25 January), because `peter` is already a
; DIFFERENT dated entry and this codebase's slugs are date-canonical, one
; date per slug (design spec §3.2). Class3/Commemoration_only/Saint, the
; SAME shape as `peter`/`paul`'s own two entries; names copied verbatim from
; `peter`'s own entry (the identical saint, the identical commemoration
; text, on a second date) -- NOT independently sourced from a missalemeum
; title (missalemeum shows no commemoration on this date at all, checked
; directly against its own fixture rows for both 2026 and 2027: neither
; year's `In Commemoratione Sancti Pauli Apostoli` row carries any
; commemoration -- missalemeum has the SAME gap this directive closes,
; verdict colitur in data/ef/expected-divergences-missalemeum.sexp's own
; M19). Colour Red: this ENTRY's own field has no independent primary-source
; pin (a bare "Commemoratio" line's own colour is not independently stated
; by the calendarium the way a full feast's class-and-colour line is -- the
; same honestly-flagged inference shape this file's own `romanus`/`eusebius-
; confessor` history already documents elsewhere in this project), chosen to
; match `paul`'s own entry and the HOST DAY's own Red -- and the host day's
; own Red IS now primary-sourced (fix round 1, coordinator finding F4), not
; merely RG 117's generic apostle/martyr default: RG 124(c), scan-verified
; word for word, `missale-romanum-1962.pdf`: "124. Item adhibetur color
; ruber in Officio et Missa de festis: ... c) Commemorationis S. Pauli
; Apostoli (30 iunii)" -- red is ALSO used in the Office and Mass of the
; feasts of ... (c) the Commemoration of St Paul the Apostle (30 June) --
; naming this exact date by number. Inert either way today
; (Commemoration_only entries are never the OBSERVED celebration, so this
; entry's OWN colour is never printed by the current pipeline, the same
; note `Edit eusebius-confessor` above makes for its own colour field).
;
; `Add major-litanies` -- NEW (ef-major-litanies task). RG 80 (Caput X, "De
; Litaniis maioribus et minoribus", §A "De Litaniis maioribus"; all three
; primary documents -- both photographic scans AND the electronic
; transcription -- word for word, no divergence to adjudicate): "80.
; Litaniae maiores assignatae sunt diei 25 aprilis; si vero eo die
; occurrit dominica Paschatis vel feria II post Pascha, transferuntur in
; sequentem feriam III." RG 81, same division: "81. De Litaniis maioribus
; nihil fit in Officio, sed tantum in Missa. Earum autem commemoratio non
; est habenda commemoratio 'de Tempore'." RG 109(f) (Caput XVI, "De
; Commemorationibus"): "f) de Litaniis maioribus, in Missa" -- a
; privileged commemoration. The calendarium's own April table (all three
; documents, e.g. the transcription: "iv c vii 25 Litania Maior. - S.
; MARCI EVANGELISTAE, II classis.") prints "Litania Maior" as part of 25
; April's own descriptive line, alongside St Mark, not as a second,
; separately class-numbered row -- corroborating RG 81's "nihil fit in
; Officio" the same way Maurice's own "Commemoratio ... " line (no class
; number) corroborates a demoted feast elsewhere in this project (see
; precedence_ef.ml's [band], top-of-function guard).
;
; MODELLING DECISION: `Commemoration_only`, `Fixed(4, 25)`, the same shape
; as `commemoration-of-st-peter` above -- because RG 81 denies the
; Litanies any Office standing at all ("nihil fit in Officio"), so they
; can never be the OBSERVED day (RG 91's table enumerates "dies
; liturgici", Office days, and this is explicitly none), only ever a Mass
; commemoration. `Precedence_ef.disposition`/`.privilege_of` wire RG
; 109(f)'s privilege and RG 80's own transfer condition (both cited in
; full at `Precedence_ef.major_litanies_slug` and its two call sites); see
; that module for the reasoning and precedence_ef.ml's own comments for
; why the transfer reuses the existing RG 96 placement machinery
; ({!Colitur_kernel.Precedence.Transfer}) rather than new machinery.
;
; `rank Class4`: RG 91's Table of Precedence has NO row for the Major
; Litanies at all (RG 81 denies them Office standing; the calendarium's
; own printed line above confirms it), so there is no class this data
; field could faithfully report -- the same situation `band`'s own
; top-of-function guard already documents for every `Commemoration_only`
; entry ("never had a row in the table for that occasion to begin with").
; `Class4` is chosen as the lowest/inertest value available, deliberately
; NOT `Class1` (which would make `Precedence_ef.privilege_of`'s branch (b),
; "of a I-class day", grant this entry Privileged status for the WRONG
; cited reason, silently making the (f) branch this task wires dead code
; again). `band` ignores rank entirely for any `Commemoration_only`
; candidate (checked first, unconditionally); `admit`'s only rank-keyed
; test for an ordinary (non-privileged) II-class-Sunday commemoration
; never applies here either, since this entry is always Privileged. No
; live behavioural consequence either way -- recorded as a deliberate,
; honestly-flagged placeholder, not a citation.
;
; `colour Violet`: NOT independently scan-verified for this specific
; entry (out of this task's scope -- Mass propers are Plan 4, `citations`
; stays `()`). Matches, by internal consistency, the colour this same
; codebase already assigns the sibling Minor Litanies/Rogation days
; (`rite_ef/temporal_ef.ml`'s own Rogation branch: `~colour:Colour.Violet`
; for RG 87's Monday/Tuesday before Ascension) -- both are "Litaniae",
; major and minor, sharing the same penitential/processional character;
; RG 80/81/109(f) themselves say nothing about colour. Inert today
; regardless (`Commemoration_only` entries are never OBSERVED, so this
; field is never printed by the current pipeline -- the same note `Edit
; eusebius-confessor` above makes for its own colour field).
;
; `subject Saint`: no clean fit among {Lord, Bvm, Saint, Temporal} -- the
; Litanies are tied to no particular Divine Person or to the BVM (RG 80/81
; name no one), and are far from an ordinary saint's feast either, but
; `Subject.Temporal` is reserved for the temporal cycle's OWN office
; (`subject.mli`), which this Fixed, sanctoral-origin entry structurally
; is not. `Saint` is the same "no special exclusion applies" default this
; codebase's own other `Commemoration_only` sanctoral entries already use
; (RG 110's own Peter/Paul companion entries, `commemoration-of-st-peter`
; immediately below) -- its only live behavioural consequence anywhere in
; this codebase, RG 112(a)/(d)'s Lord/BVM mutual-exclusion rules, is one
; this entry should NOT trigger either way, so `Saint` is safe as well as
; consistent.
;
; `names`: English ("The Major Litanies") is a plain translation of RG
; 80's own "Litaniae maiores", not independently primary-sourced (no
; English title exists in any of the three documents, all Latin). Polish
; ("Litanie Większe") likewise a plain vernacular rendering, not verified
; against any external Polish liturgical reference -- flagged here rather
; than presented as sourced, the same honesty this file's own
; `commemoration-of-st-peter` entry gives its own colour field above.
;
; ef-sanctoral-audit (2026-08-14, branch ef-sanctoral-audit): a full
; extraction of the CALENDARIUM (both photographic scans, missale-romanum-
; 1962.pdf and Missale Romanum 1962_text.pdf, pdftoppm-rendered page images
; read directly, not their pre-existing OCR text layers, which the task
; brief's own worked examples show are unreliable for exactly this kind of
; check) against all 327 base entries plus the two prior overlay Adds.
; Method and full findings: docs/research/rules-register.md's own audit
; rewrite (bucket recomputation) and .superpowers/sdd/2026-08-12-colitur-
; rg16a/sanctoral-audit-report.md. Two shapes of finding follow.
;
; `Add barbara` -- a genuine DATA GAP, the same shape as the ef-rebootstrap
; task's five (agnes-secundo/boniface-martyr/eusebius-confessor/evaristus/
; theodore, above): both scans, 4 December, carry a second line under S.
; Petri Chrysologi's own entry, "Commemoratio S. Barbarae Virg. et Mart."
; -- a real, standing commemoration, absent from `data/ef/sanctoral.sexp`
; AND from lectio's own `tridentine-calendar.ini` (checked directly: its
; 12-04 block holds only `peter-chrysologus`, then jumps straight to
; `sabbas`/12-05) -- not a colitur bootstrap miss, the same upstream gap
; shape the ef-rebootstrap task's own five entries already documented.
; Rank `Class3`: bootstrapped by the SAME convention every other
; `Commemoration_only` entry in this file uses (see the rank-inference note
; below) -- the calendarium gives a bare "Commemoratio", no class numeral,
; for any commemoration, hers included. Colour Red: RG 124(e), scan-
; verified word for word (both photographic scans, "XVIII - De coloribus
; paramentorum", "C) De colore rubro"): "adhibetur color ruber in Officio
; et Missa de festis: ... e) Sanctorum Martyrum, quorum colitur aut
; martyrium..." -- red for the feast of a Martyr's own martyrdom, and the
; calendarium's own line names her "Virg. et Mart." Names: English a plain
; translation of "Barbarae"; Polish a plain vernacular rendering -- neither
; independently primary-sourced, the same honesty this file's own
; `commemoration-of-st-peter` entry already gives its names.
;
; Eighteen `Edit ... ((Set_colour ...))` directives -- confirmed lectio/
; missalemeum bootstrap DATA DEFECTS, the identical shape and root cause as
; `eusebius-confessor` above (checked individually against
; `~/git/projects/lectio/internal/caldata/tridentine-calendar.ini`: every
; one of these 17 slugs' wrong colour is already wrong AT THE SOURCE, not
; introduced by colitur's own bootstrap step -- e.g. `martha`'s own Polish
; field there already reads "św. Marty, Dziewicy" (Virgin, no "Męczennicy"
; suffix), contradicting that SAME ini record's own `colour = red`). Two
; rules, both scan-verified word for word against RG 124 ("XVIII - De
; coloribus paramentorum", missale-romanum-1962.pdf, both photographic
; scans agree): (124.b) "adhibetur color ruber in Officio et Missa de
; festis: ... Sanctorum Apostolorum et Evangelistarum, in eorum die
; natalicio, EXCEPTO FESTO S. IOANNIS (27 decembris)" -- red for an
; Apostle/Evangelist's OWN feast day, John's 27 December the one named
; exception (already correctly White in the base data, untouched here);
; (124.e) "Sanctorum Martyrum, quorum colitur aut martyrium" -- red for a
; Martyr's own martyrdom. Every plain Confessor/Bishop/Virgin entry below
; (no "Mart."/"Mm." in the calendarium's own line, not an Apostle) is
; White by RG 117's five-colour residual (not itself independently
; RG-124-cited the way the red corrections are, since 124 enumerates the
; RED exceptions, not a white default) -- flagged as inferred-by-category,
; the same distinction the design spec draws throughout. `peter` (25
; January, a commemoration of the Apostle nested under `conversion-of-st-
; paul`) is corrected by CONSISTENCY with this file's own established
; precedent, not a fresh RG 124 citation of its own: `paul`'s sibling
; commemoration (22 February, under `chair-of-st-peter`) already carries
; Red in the base bootstrap, and `commemoration-of-st-peter` above (30
; June) was deliberately set Red "to match the host day's own Red" by an
; earlier task -- the identical RG 110 Peter/Paul-pair shape, so `peter`
; is the one inconsistent survivor, not a newly-discovered rule.
((id ef-adjustments)
  (directives
    ((Suppress vigil-of-christmas)
      (Edit most-holy-name-of-mary ((Set_subject Bvm)))
      (Edit eusebius-confessor ((Set_colour White)))
      (Add
        ((date (Fixed (month 6) (day 30)))
          (cel
            ((slug commemoration-of-st-peter)
              (names
                ((en "St. Peter") (pl "\197\155w. Piotra, Aposto\197\130a")))
              (rank Class3) (status Commemoration_only) (colour Red)
              (subject Saint) (citations ()) (layer ef-universal)))))
      (Add
        ((date (Fixed (month 4) (day 25)))
          (cel
            ((slug major-litanies)
              (names ((en "The Major Litanies") (pl "Litanie Większe")))
              (rank Class4) (status Commemoration_only) (colour Violet)
              (subject Saint) (citations ()) (layer ef-universal)))))
      (Add
        ((date (Fixed (month 12) (day 4)))
          (cel
            ((slug barbara)
              (names
                ((en "St. Barbara") (pl "\197\155w. Barbary, Dziewicy i M\196\153czennicy")))
              (rank Class3) (status Commemoration_only) (colour Red)
              (subject Saint) (citations ()) (layer ef-universal)))))
            ; A SECOND genuine gap, found by the same audit and DELIBERATELY NOT
      ; FILLED -- recorded here, in the tracked tree, because the five prior
      ; upstream-gap precedents live in this file and this is where the next
      ; auditor will be standing. Both scans' 25 December row reads
      ; "IN NATIVITATE DOMINI, I classis cum oct." followed by "In secunda
      ; Missa: Commemoratio S. Anastasiae Mart." -- she is scoped to the
      ; SECOND of Christmas's three Masses, and it is the only per-Mass
      ; scoping notation in the whole twelve-month calendarium.
      ; Celebration.t attaches a commemoration to a DATE with no Mass scope,
      ; and temporal_ef builds exactly one office per civil day, so adding
      ; her the way `barbara` was added would ship a false positive on every
      ; 25 December. The obvious action on rediscovery is the wrong one.
      ; Open modelling question, register section 6.
(Edit prisca ((Set_colour Red)))
      ; REVERTED by the fix-round review: conversion-of-st-paul (25 Jan),
      ; peter (25 Jan) and chair-of-st-peter (22 Feb) were set Red here on
      ; RG 124(b), whose own qualifier "in eorum die natalicio" does not
      ; reach them -- and RG 120(f), fifteen lines ABOVE 124(b) in the same
      ; column, NAMES both feasts by name and by date in the enumeration of
      ; WHITE: "f) S. Ioannis Ap. et Ev. (27 decembris); Cathedrae S. Petri
      ; (22 februarii); Conversionis S. Pauli (25 ianuarii); Nativitatis S.
      ; Ioannis Baptistae (24 iunii)". RG 475(e) confirms it a third time:
      ; "in festis nataliciis Apostolorum et Evangelistarum, NECNON in
      ; festis Cathedrae S. Petri et S. Barnabae Ap." -- the Missal names
      ; the Chair separately precisely because "natalician feasts of
      ; Apostles" does not include it. lectio and missalemeum both said
      ; white because both were right.
      ; `peter` (25 Jan) additionally rested on "match the host day's own
      ; Red", by analogy to commemoration-of-st-peter (30 June). That works
      ; there because 30 June's host is red BY NAME under RG 124(c); here
      ; the host is white BY NAME under RG 120(f), so the same precedent
      ; yields White. Its other anchor, `paul` @ 22 Feb (Red in base data),
      ; is unverified bootstrap on a day the Missal calls white and is now
      ; an open question in the register, not a precedent.
      ; ROOT CAUSE, recorded so it is not repeated: the audit's page-image
      ; method was applied to the CALENDARIUM and not to the RUBRIC. RG 124
      ; was read from the OCR text layer, where the two-column interleave
      ; shreds RG 120(f) across rows belonging to RG 115, renders its clause
      ; label as "/ )" and hyphen-splits "Ca-"/"thedrae" -- so a text-layer
      ; grep for "Cathedr" returns nothing, while RG 124's own enumeration
      ; survives the same interleave cleanly. A text-layer read of that
      ; chapter finds 124 and STRUCTURALLY CANNOT find 120(f).
      (Edit vitus ((Set_colour Red)))
      (Edit margaret ((Set_colour Red)))
      (Edit apollinaris ((Set_colour Red)))
      (Edit agapitus ((Set_colour Red)))
      (Edit josaphat ((Set_colour Red)))
      (Edit john-of-san-fecundo ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit ephrem-of-syria ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit julia-of-falconieri ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit john-gualbert ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit camillus-de-lellis ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit jerome-emiliani ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit liborii ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit martha ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit alphonsus-liguori ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit augustine ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit rose-of-lima ((Set_colour White)))
      (Edit mark-i ((Set_colour White)))

      ; --- ef-lectionary Task 6: the eight class-3 saints whose Mass the
      ; 1962 Missal prints IN FULL, with its own Epistle and Gospel.
      ;
      ; Fifteen class-3 saints reached this branch with no readings at all
      ; (data/ef/sanctoral.sexp, `(citations ())` -- they are exactly the
      ; fifteen `status Feast` entries in that file that have none, checked
      ; not assumed). They are the 6 March - 5 April cluster whose RANKS
      ; lectio's own generator fix of 2026-08-12 restored without
      ; backfilling readings, and lectio has no Commons concept to have
      ; backfilled them from.
      ;
      ; The Missal splits them cleanly in two, and the split is NOT the one
      ; the plan predicted (it expected propers for Benedict, Patrick,
      ; Thomas Aquinas and Gregory the Great; only Thomas Aquinas has one).
      ; The seven that the Missal sends to a Common are routed through
      ; data/ef/commons.sexp instead -- see that file's header for the whole
      ; method, the Commune Sanctorum's own substitution rubric, and the
      ; per-Common evidence. The eight below are the ones the Missal prints
      ; a full Mass for at the date itself, so the readings are ASSIGNED
      ; ("certa Epistola aut certum Evangelium in Missali ... assignata",
      ; the Commune's own proviso) and belong on the celebration.
      ;
      ; They are Edits here, not corrections to data/ef/sanctoral.sexp,
      ; because that file is GENERATED (tools/bootstrap_sanctoral.ml) and
      ; its source is upstream in lectio -- the same reasoning the colour
      ; corrections above already carry. If lectio ever gains these
      ; readings, `Set_citation` is idempotent (overlay.ml's own
      ; [apply_field_edit] replaces the matching part), so the Edits stay
      ; harmless and stand as a regression guard.
      ;
      ; EVERY value below was read in three independent places before being
      ; written: docs/research/scan1.txt (CMAA scan), docs/research/scan2.txt
      ; (Internet Archive scan -- a DIFFERENT printing), and the rendered
      ; page images of missale-romanum-1962.pdf. Both text layers interleave
      ; the two-column page, so no value rests on a single reading. There is
      ; NO oracle for any of this: layer 3 (lectio) has no readings for these
      ; feasts at all, and layer 4 (missalemeum, 2026-2027) never observes
      ; one of them in either year.
      ;
      ; OBSERVABILITY, measured against the real resolver over 1950-2200:
      ; only three of the eight are EVER the observed office --
      ; thomas-aquinas (6 days, e.g. 2000-03-07, 2011-03-07), john-of-god
      ; (5 days, e.g. 2011-03-08, 2038-03-08), francis-of-paola (2 days,
      ; 2008-04-02, 2160-04-02). The other five fall on dates always held by
      ; a Lenten or Passiontide feria that outranks a III-class feast, so
      ; they are only ever COMMEMORATIONS, and colitur emits readings for
      ; the observed office only. Their citations are correct data with no
      ; live witness today; they are recorded rather than omitted so that a
      ; diocesan overlay or a rank change finds them already sourced.

      ; 7 March, "S. Thomae de Aquino, Conf. et Eccl. Doct., III classis":
      ; "Lectio libri Sapientiae. Sap. 7, 7-14" / "Sequentia sancti
      ; Evangelii secundum Matthaeum. Mt. 5, 13-19".
      ; scan1:27701-27704 + 27699-27700; scan2:30588-30589 + 30643-30646;
      ; page image p. 484. (scan2's OCR renders the Gospel chapter as "6";
      ; scan1 and the page image both print 5, and the pericope is "Vos
      ; estis sal terrae", Mt 5:13-19.)
      (Edit thomas-aquinas
        ((Set_citation First "Wis 7:7-14") (Set_citation Gospel "Matt 5:13-19")))

      ; 8 March, "S. Ioannis a Deo Conf., III classis":
      ; "Lectio libri Sapientiae. Eccli. 31, 8-11" / "Sequentia sancti
      ; Evangelii secundum Matthaeum. Mt. 22, 34-46".
      ; scan1:27732-27734 + 27769-27770; scan2:30698-30699 + 30733-30736;
      ; page image p. 485. NOTE: the Epistle is the Common of a Confessor
      ; not a Bishop's own, but the GOSPEL is not (that Common has Luke
      ; 12:35-40) -- the Missal prints him a full Mass with an assigned
      ; Gospel, so this is a proper, not a Common. (scan2's OCR renders the
      ; Gospel's last verse as 48; scan1 and the page image print 46, and
      ; the pericope ends at "neque ausus fuit quisquam ex illa die eum
      ; amplius interrogare" = Mt 22:46.)
      (Edit john-of-god
        ((Set_citation First "Ecclus 31:8-11") (Set_citation Gospel "Matt 22:34-46")))

      ; 10 March, "Ss. Quadraginta Martyrum, III classis":
      ; "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli ad Hebraeos. Hebr. 11, 33-39"
      ; / "Sequentia sancti Evangelii secundum Lucam. Luc. 6, 17-23".
      ; scan1:27841-27842 + 27832-27834; scan2:30766-30768 + 30821-30823.
      (Edit forty-holy-martyrs-of-sebaste
        ((Set_citation First "Heb 11:33-39") (Set_citation Gospel "Luke 6:17-23")))

      ; 18 March, "S. Cyrilli Ep. Hierosolymitani, Conf. et Eccl. Doct.,
      ; III classis": "Lectio libri Sapientiae. Eccli. 39, 6-14" /
      ; "Sequentia sancti Evangelii secundum Matthaeum. Mt. 10, 23-28".
      ; scan1:27948-27949 + 27953-27955; scan2:30890-30896 + 30948-30951;
      ; page image p. 489. This Epistle is the Common of Doctors' own
      ; labelled ALTERNATIVE ("Item altera Epistola pro Doctoribus") -- here
      ; it is assigned outright at the date, which is what makes it his.
      (Edit cyril-of-jerusalem
        ((Set_citation First "Ecclus 39:6-14") (Set_citation Gospel "Matt 10:23-28")))

      ; 24 March, "S. Gabrielis Archangeli, III classis":
      ; "Lectio Danielis Prophetae. Dan. 9, 21-26" / "Sequentia sancti
      ; Evangelii secundum Lucam. Luc. 1, 26-38".
      ; scan1:28149-28150 + 28175-28176; scan2:31070-31074 + 31158-31160;
      ; page images pp. 493-494.
      ;
      ; THE ONE GENUINE CONFLICT BETWEEN THE TWO PRINTINGS, and the reason
      ; this task's cross-check discipline exists. scan1's edition prints
      ; the Gospel citation as "Luc. 2, 26-38" -- confirmed on the page
      ; image, so it is a TYPOGRAPHICAL ERROR IN THAT PRINTING, not an OCR
      ; artefact. scan2's edition prints "Luc. 1, 26-38". Three independent
      ; things settle it for Luke 1: (a) scan2's own text; (b) the pericope
      ; printed under the citation in BOTH editions is "Missus est Angelus
      ; Gabriel ... Ecce ancilla Domini", which is Luke 1:26-38 -- Luke
      ; 2:26-38 is Simeon and Anna, a different passage entirely; (c) the
      ; SAME edition that misprints it here prints the identical pericope
      ; two pages later for the Annunciation (25 March, page image p. 496)
      ; and cites it correctly as "Luc. 1, 26-38".
      (Edit gabriel-the-archangel
        ((Set_citation First "Dan 9:21-26") (Set_citation Gospel "Luke 1:26-38")))

      ; 27 March, "S. Ioannis Damasceni, Conf. et Eccl. Doct., III classis":
      ; "Lectio libri Sapientiae. Sap. 10, 10-17" / "Sequentia sancti
      ; Evangelii secundum Lucam. Luc. 6, 6-11".
      ; scan1:28305-28306 + 28319-28320; scan2:31326-31328 + 31344-31346;
      ; page image p. 497. The 10-17 (here) versus 10-14 (John of
      ; Capistrano, next entry) split is real and agreed by all three
      ; sources: this pericope runs on through "Et reddidit iustis mercedem
      ; laborum suorum" (Wis 10:17), his does not.
      (Edit john-damascene
        ((Set_citation First "Wis 10:10-17") (Set_citation Gospel "Luke 6:6-11")))

      ; 28 March, "S. Ioannis de Capistrano Conf., III classis":
      ; "Lectio libri Sapientiae. Sap. 10, 10-14" / "Sequentia sancti
      ; Evangelii secundum Lucam. Luc. 9, 1-6".
      ; scan1:28346-28348 + 28412-28413; scan2:31382-31387 + 31445-31447;
      ; page image p. 498 (the pericope there ends at "et in vinculis non
      ; dereliquit illum" = Wis 10:14).
      (Edit john-of-capistrano
        ((Set_citation First "Wis 10:10-14") (Set_citation Gospel "Luke 9:1-6")))

      ; 2 April, "S. Francisci de Paula Conf., III classis":
      ; "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli ad Philippenses. Philipp. 3,
      ; 7-12" / "Sequentia sancti Evangelii secundum Lucam. Luc. 12, 32-34".
      ; scan1:28585-28586 + 28587-28588; scan2:31560-31562 + 31625-31630.
      ; (scan2's OCR of the Gospel citation is shredded to "Lac. U, 32-34";
      ; scan1 prints it cleanly and the pericope is "Nolite timere,
      ; pusillus grex", Luke 12:32-34.)
      (Edit francis-of-paola
        ((Set_citation First "Phil 3:7-12") (Set_citation Gospel "Luke 12:32-34"))))))