comments that explain the code, not how it was written

About 340 comments cited the development process: task and plan
numbers, fix waves, rulings, reviewers, and the author in the third
person with a date. None of that exists outside the work itself, so to
a reader it pointed at nothing. Each one now states the engineering
reason it was standing in front of; where a comment was provenance and
nothing else, it is gone.

References to docs/design.md and docs/gui-design.md by section stay:
both ship with the repository. The design documents lose their
amendment diaries - CHANGELOG.md is that record - and the GUI's says
plainly that the window has gone further than the document.

Only comments changed. Every .go file was parsed and its code printed
with comments stripped, before and after: the two hashes are identical
across all 175 files.

1 files changed, 8 insertions, 9 deletions

diff --git a/cmd/krino/review.go b/cmd/krino/review.go
index 8253405..671cbab 100644
--- a/cmd/krino/review.go
+++ b/cmd/krino/review.go
@@ -58,9 +58,9 @@ func (k keyReader) Read(p []byte) (int, error) {
 // decided and stops. approved holds every file decided, true for yes and
 // false for no; a file [w] left unreviewed is absent. replaced holds the
 // files [t] or [d] chose to trash or delete instead of what the rules
-// planned; replaceChains applies it. Enter is ignored at both prompts. root is the directory being reviewed - passed only to
-// reviewPerFile's destination rendering (review finding 1, fix round
-// 2026-09-12); nothing here uses it directly.
+// planned; replaceChains applies it. Enter is ignored at both prompts. root
+// is the directory being reviewed - passed only to reviewPerFile's
+// destination rendering; nothing here uses it directly.
 func reviewChains(in io.Reader, out io.Writer, chains []plan.Chain, root string, p palette) (map[string]bool, map[string]plan.Kind, rune, error) {
 	fmt.Fprintln(out)
 	for _, l := range wrapped("", "[a] apply all  [c] choose per file  [s] skip this directory  [q] quit", 0, widthPolicy(out), p.keys) {
@@ -108,10 +108,9 @@ func reviewChains(in io.Reader, out io.Writer, chains []plan.Chain, root string,
 // other key asks about the same file again); every choice is echoed in red
 // on its own line; [w] stops asking and applies whatever was already chosen,
 // leaving the rest unreviewed - reported back as end 'w'; [q] aborts the
-// review entirely, discarding even files already marked yes - end 'q'. root is
-// passed down so a destination inside root renders root-relative and one
-// outside it renders ~-abbreviated, exactly as in the plan (review finding
-// 1, fix round 2026-09-12).
+// review entirely, discarding even files already marked yes - end 'q'. root
+// is passed down so a destination inside root renders root-relative and one
+// outside it renders ~-abbreviated, exactly as in the plan.
 func reviewPerFile(in io.Reader, out io.Writer, chains []plan.Chain, root string, p palette) (approved map[string]bool, replaced map[string]plan.Kind, end rune, err error) {
 	approved = map[string]bool{}
 	replaced = map[string]plan.Kind{}
@@ -122,8 +121,8 @@ func reviewPerFile(in io.Reader, out io.Writer, chains []plan.Chain, root string
 			continue
 		}
 
-		// The heading wraps with its continuation past the label column, so
-		// a long name cannot pass for a step line (plan 11 review L4).
+		// The heading wraps with its continuation past the label column,
+		// so a long name cannot pass for a step line.
 		fmt.Fprintln(out)
 		for _, l := range wrapped("", fmt.Sprintf("[%d/%d] %s", i+1, len(chains), display(c.File.Rel)), 7+labelWidth+1, widthPolicy(out), plainText) {
 			fmt.Fprintln(out, l)