comments that explain the code, not how it was written

About 340 comments cited the development process: task and plan
numbers, fix waves, rulings, reviewers, and the author in the third
person with a date. None of that exists outside the work itself, so to
a reader it pointed at nothing. Each one now states the engineering
reason it was standing in front of; where a comment was provenance and
nothing else, it is gone.

References to docs/design.md and docs/gui-design.md by section stay:
both ship with the repository. The design documents lose their
amendment diaries - CHANGELOG.md is that record - and the GUI's says
plainly that the window has gone further than the document.

Only comments changed. Every .go file was parsed and its code printed
with comments stripped, before and after: the two hashes are identical
across all 175 files.

1 files changed, 5 insertions, 8 deletions

diff --git a/internal/cond/eval.go b/internal/cond/eval.go
index 1147c05..2c35dba 100644
--- a/internal/cond/eval.go
+++ b/internal/cond/eval.go
@@ -26,8 +26,7 @@ type Facts interface {
 	Duplicate(dirs []string) (original string, ok bool, err error)
 	// Matched reports whether an earlier rule matched this file, and whether
 	// an earlier rule could not be decided (its condition was unknown): with
-	// no match and an undecided rule, (matched) is unknown (plan 11 review
-	// L6).
+	// no match and an undecided rule, (matched) is unknown.
 	Matched() (matched, undecided bool)
 }
 
@@ -40,12 +39,11 @@ type Result struct {
 
 	// Unreadable is true when the condition's value is unknown: it depends
 	// on a content test that could not read the file. Match is then false;
-	// an exclude holds anyway (review M11). A condition decided whatever the
-	// text holds - (and (content "x") (type txt)) on a pdf - is not
-	// unknown (plan 11).
+	// an exclude holds anyway. A condition decided whatever the text holds
+	// - (and (content "x") (type txt)) on a pdf - is not unknown.
 	Unreadable bool
 	// Undecided says what made the value unknown: "content unreadable",
-	// "duplicate check failed", or both, comma-separated (plan 12).
+	// "duplicate check failed", or both, comma-separated.
 	Undecided string
 }
 
@@ -95,8 +93,7 @@ func (ctx *evalCtx) undecidedLabel() string {
 }
 
 // undecidable reports whether a leaf whose fact could not be read is
-// unknown rather than false: a content test (review M11) or a duplicate
-// test (plan 12).
+// unknown rather than false: a content test or a duplicate test.
 func undecidable(k kind) bool {
 	return k == kContent || k == kDuplicate
 }