caldata: two Judith citations lost a chapter boundary

The Assumption's epistle is Iudith 13, 22-25 et 15, 10 -- two chapters. It was
recorded as "Judith 13:22-25; 13:15; 13:10", carrying chapter 13 across the
boundary and inventing two verses that are not in the Mass at all, on a
I-class feast.

The Seven Sorrows' is Iudith 13, 22 et 23-25. It was recorded as
"Judith 13:22; 13:25", keeping only the range's endpoint.

Both verified in the photographic scans of the 1962 Missal:
  Assumption      IN ASSUMPTIONE B.M.V.   "Iudith 13, 22-25; 15, 10"
  Seven Sorrows   SEPTEM DOLORUM B.M.V.   "Iudith 13, 22 et 23-25",
                                          printed identically at its Mass and
                                          in the votive Mass of the same feast.

Found by comparing a full liturgical year (2028-12-03 .. 2029-12-01) against
missalemeum's live API, day by day, while giving colitur a lectionary of its
own. 333 of 364 days already agreed; these were two of three genuine
divergences in the remainder.

The third was St Monica (4 May): missalemeum serves Prov 31:10-17, this data
serves 1 Tim 5:3-10. The Missal gives her a proper epistle -- "Lectio
Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli ad Timotheum", 1 Tim 5, 3-10, "Carissime:
Viduas honora, quae vere viduae sunt" -- in both scans. No change: the oracle
is wrong there, not this data.

0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions