aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/mobile/mobile_test.go
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'mobile/mobile_test.go')
-rw-r--r--mobile/mobile_test.go211
1 files changed, 211 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/mobile/mobile_test.go b/mobile/mobile_test.go
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..85de500
--- /dev/null
+++ b/mobile/mobile_test.go
@@ -0,0 +1,211 @@
+package mobile
+
+import (
+ "encoding/json"
+ "strings"
+ "testing"
+)
+
+func decodeDay(t *testing.T, s string) map[string]any {
+ t.Helper()
+ var m map[string]any
+ if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(s), &m); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("Day returned invalid JSON: %v\n%s", err, s)
+ }
+ return m
+}
+
+func TestDayCarriesLocalisedRank(t *testing.T) {
+ pl := decodeDay(t, Day("2026-08-01", "of", "vul", "pl"))
+ if pl["rank"] != "memorial" {
+ t.Errorf("pl rank = %v, want memorial", pl["rank"])
+ }
+ if pl["rank_label"] != "wspomnienie obowiązkowe" {
+ t.Errorf("pl rank_label = %v", pl["rank_label"])
+ }
+ en := decodeDay(t, Day("2026-08-01", "of", "vul", "en"))
+ if en["rank_label"] != "memorial" {
+ t.Errorf("en rank_label = %v", en["rank_label"])
+ }
+}
+
+// The app shows the colour as a swatch and never as a word, so the raw key must
+// be present and no localised label may be. This test exists so the app cannot
+// quietly start depending on a colour word.
+func TestDayHasColourKeyButNoColourLabel(t *testing.T) {
+ m := decodeDay(t, Day("2026-08-01", "of", "vul", "pl"))
+ if m["colour"] != "white" {
+ t.Errorf("colour = %v, want white", m["colour"])
+ }
+ if _, present := m["colour_label"]; present {
+ t.Error("colour_label must not be returned: the app draws a swatch")
+ }
+}
+
+func decodeDays(t *testing.T, s string) []map[string]any {
+ t.Helper()
+ var a []map[string]any
+ if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(s), &a); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("Days returned invalid JSON: %v\n%s", err, s)
+ }
+ return a
+}
+
+func TestDaysReturnsConsecutiveDates(t *testing.T) {
+ a := decodeDays(t, Days("2026-07-27", 7, "of", "pl"))
+ if len(a) != 7 {
+ t.Fatalf("got %d elements, want 7", len(a))
+ }
+ want := []string{"2026-07-27", "2026-07-28", "2026-07-29", "2026-07-30",
+ "2026-07-31", "2026-08-01", "2026-08-02"}
+ for i, w := range want {
+ if a[i]["date"] != w {
+ t.Errorf("element %d date = %v, want %v", i, a[i]["date"], w)
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// Days must agree with Day about the same date -- it is a cheaper projection of
+// the same computation, not a second implementation.
+func TestDaysAgreesWithDay(t *testing.T) {
+ one := decodeDay(t, Day("2026-08-01", "of", "vul", "pl"))
+ week := decodeDays(t, Days("2026-08-01", 1, "of", "pl"))
+ if len(week) != 1 {
+ t.Fatalf("got %d elements, want 1", len(week))
+ }
+ row := week[0]
+ for _, k := range []string{"name", "colour", "rank", "rank_label"} {
+ if row[k] != one[k] {
+ t.Errorf("%s: Days = %v, Day = %v", k, row[k], one[k])
+ }
+ }
+ parts := row["parts"].([]any)
+ readings := one["readings"].([]any)
+ if len(parts) != len(readings) {
+ t.Fatalf("parts = %d, readings = %d", len(parts), len(readings))
+ }
+ for i := range parts {
+ p := parts[i].(map[string]any)
+ r := readings[i].(map[string]any)
+ if p["part"] != r["part"] || p["citation"] != r["citation"] {
+ t.Errorf("element %d: Days %v/%v vs Day %v/%v",
+ i, p["part"], p["citation"], r["part"], r["citation"])
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// No reading text may cross the boundary: that is the whole point of Days.
+func TestDaysCarriesNoReadingText(t *testing.T) {
+ s := Days("2026-08-01", 7, "of", "pl")
+ if strings.Contains(s, `"text"`) {
+ t.Error("Days must not return reading text")
+ }
+ if strings.Contains(s, "colour_label") {
+ t.Error("Days must not return a colour label")
+ }
+}
+
+func TestDaysRejectsBadInput(t *testing.T) {
+ for _, c := range []struct {
+ start string
+ count int
+ }{
+ {"not-a-date", 7}, {"2026-08-01", 0}, {"2026-08-01", -1}, {"2026-08-01", 400},
+ {"2026-08-01", 367}, // one past the documented upper bound
+ } {
+ if got := Days(c.start, c.count, "of", "pl"); got != "[]" {
+ t.Errorf("Days(%q, %d) = %s, want []", c.start, c.count, got)
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+// count's documented range is 1..366; 367 (above) is the first invalid value
+// and 366 (here) is the last valid one -- the boundary an off-by-one would
+// actually live on.
+func TestDaysAcceptsUpperBoundCount(t *testing.T) {
+ a := decodeDays(t, Days("2026-01-01", 366, "of", "en"))
+ if len(a) != 366 {
+ t.Errorf("got %d elements, want 366", len(a))
+ }
+}
+
+func BenchmarkDaysWeek(b *testing.B) {
+ for i := 0; i < b.N; i++ {
+ Days("2026-07-27", 7, "of", "pl")
+ }
+}
+
+// This is the assertion that would have caught the app's dead 1962 checkboxes:
+// it listed nine part IDs where the engine emits two.
+func TestPartLabelsMatchesWhatTheEngineEmits(t *testing.T) {
+ var ef []map[string]any
+ if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(PartLabels("ef", "pl")), &ef); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("invalid JSON: %v", err)
+ }
+ if len(ef) != 2 {
+ t.Fatalf("ef: got %d labels, want 2: %v", len(ef), ef)
+ }
+ if ef[0]["part"] != "epistola" || ef[0]["label"] != "Lekcja" {
+ t.Errorf("ef[0] = %v, want epistola/Lekcja", ef[0])
+ }
+ if ef[1]["part"] != "evangelium" || ef[1]["label"] != "Ewangelia" {
+ t.Errorf("ef[1] = %v, want evangelium/Ewangelia", ef[1])
+ }
+
+ // OF: derive the expected set from what Days actually emits over a full
+ // year (2026 -- a full Sunday cycle, so second readings appear too),
+ // rather than hand-copying the production list, which asserts a
+ // declaration against itself and can never fail for this class of bug
+ // (that is exactly how the app came to render a checkbox -- aklamacja --
+ // that filters an ID the engine never emits).
+ observed := map[string]bool{}
+ s := Days("2026-01-01", 365, "of", "pl")
+ var days []map[string]any
+ if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(s), &days); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("Days returned invalid JSON: %v", err)
+ }
+ for _, d := range days {
+ parts, _ := d["parts"].([]any)
+ for _, p := range parts {
+ part, _ := p.(map[string]any)
+ if id, ok := part["part"].(string); ok {
+ observed[id] = true
+ }
+ }
+ }
+ if len(observed) == 0 {
+ t.Fatal("swept zero part IDs from Days over 2026 -- the sweep is broken, not necessarily the engine")
+ }
+
+ var of []map[string]any
+ if err := json.Unmarshal([]byte(PartLabels("of", "pl")), &of); err != nil {
+ t.Fatalf("invalid JSON: %v", err)
+ }
+ got := map[string]bool{}
+ for _, e := range of {
+ got[e["part"].(string)] = true
+ }
+ if len(got) != len(of) {
+ t.Fatalf("PartLabels(of) lists a part ID more than once: %v", of)
+ }
+ for id := range observed {
+ if !got[id] {
+ t.Errorf("Days emits part %q somewhere in 2026 but PartLabels(of) does not list it: %v", id, of)
+ }
+ }
+ for id := range got {
+ if !observed[id] {
+ t.Errorf("PartLabels(of) lists part %q but Days never emits it anywhere in 2026: %v", id, of)
+ }
+ }
+}
+
+func TestPartLabelsUnknownForm(t *testing.T) {
+ // An unknown form is treated as the modern one, matching lectByForm: the
+ // fallback must be byte-identical to "of", not merely non-empty.
+ got := PartLabels("nonsense", "en")
+ want := PartLabels("of", "en")
+ if got != want {
+ t.Errorf("PartLabels(\"nonsense\", \"en\") = %s, want %s (same as \"of\")", got, want)
+ }
+}