diff options
Diffstat (limited to 'lang/la.ini')
| -rw-r--r-- | lang/la.ini | 413 |
1 files changed, 413 insertions, 0 deletions
diff --git a/lang/la.ini b/lang/la.ini index 536f717..821acff 100644 --- a/lang/la.ini +++ b/lang/la.ini @@ -1790,3 +1790,416 @@ rogation-wednesday = Feria IV Rogationum ; PATTERN, because the Missal's own text for this specific day was found ; (Wednesday's own station, "ad S. Petrum") and is transcribed, not built ; by pattern. + +[sigla] +; The Vulgate/Latin citation convention -- abbreviated book, "chapter:verses", +; "first-last" for a verse range, "; " between parts, ", " between verse +; ranges. This is byte-identical to Colitur_citation.Render.default_style +; (render.ml), so shipping this section changes NO rendered output -- Task 9 +; Step 5 already asserted the pre-Task-10 baseline against exactly these +; values. +; book_sep ships as a PLAIN space, not U+00A0 (the non-breaking space): a +; user who wants the non-breaking form for typeset output (so "Luc." and +; "3, 1" never split across a line break) sets it themselves -- see +; Render.book_sep's own note. Written here as a literal space between the +; "=" and the closing quote; it is invisible in a terminal and easy to +; mistake for something else when editing by hand. +book = abbr +book_sep = " " +chapter_verse = {chapter}:{verses} +range = {first}-{last} +part_sep = "; " +verse_sep = ", " + +[bible] +; Task 10. Every id in Colitur_citation.Book.all (lib/citation/book.ml), each +; with a `.full` and an `.abbr` form. +; +; SOURCING METHOD -- do not invent a Latin title. `docs/research/scan1.txt` +; and `docs/research/scan2.txt` are page-image OCR of the 1962 Missale +; Romanum; `docs/research/LT.txt` is an independent electronic transcription +; (accented, ligatured). The Missal never prints a standalone table of book +; names -- what is transcribed below is the TAIL of the reading's own +; incipit, following four recurring patterns, each attested many times +; across both scans: +; "Lectio libri X" -> "Liber X" (OT books) +; "Lectio X Prophetae" -> "X Propheta" (Prophets; +; genitive -> nominative, e.g. "Isaiae" -> "Isaias") +; "Sequentia sancti Evangelii secundum X" -> "Evangelium secundum X" (Gospels) +; "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli ad X" -> "Epistola ad X" (Pauline) +; "Lectio Actuum Apostolorum" -> "Actus Apostolorum" (Acts) +; "Lectio libri Apocalypsis beati Ioannis Apostoli" -> "Liber Apocalypsis" +; "Lectio Epistolae beati N Apostoli" -> "Epistola beati N Apostoli" +; (James, 1 John, 1-2 Peter: no "ad X" destination to shorten to, so +; the attribution stays -- the only thing that identifies the book) +; Every `.full` below cites the scan/line where its pattern was read; every +; `.abbr` cites a clean chapter:verse LOCATOR line (e.g. "3 Reg. 19, 3-8"), +; which is where this Missal's own Latin abbreviations actually live -- the +; incipit itself is never abbreviated. +; +; UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS. Six pairs share ONE Missal incipit regardless of +; which volume/letter is being read -- "Lectio libri Regum" precedes a "3 +; Reg." locator on one page and a "4 Reg." locator on another; likewise +; "...ad Corinthios"/"...ad Timotheum"/"...ad Thessalonicenses"/"Epistolae +; beati Petri Apostoli" never say "prima"/"secunda" or "I"/"II" anywhere in +; the incipit itself (checked: no "prima"/"secunda ad Corinthios/Timotheum" +; and no "I."/"II. ad Corinthios/Timotheum" anywhere in either scan). Each +; pair therefore shares the SAME `.full` and differs only in `.abbr`, which +; the numbered locator DOES distinguish -- kings_3/kings_4, +; corinthians_1/corinthians_2, thessalonians_1/thessalonians_2, +; timothy_1/timothy_2, peter_1/peter_2. This is not a guess filling a gap: +; it is what the primary text itself does. +; +; A CORRECTION TO THIS TASK'S OWN SOURCING NOTE +; (.superpowers/sdd/2026-08-20-colitur-citations/latin-book-titles-sourcing.md). +; Re-running that note's own commands, but counting EVERY hit rather than +; eyeballing the sorted-by-frequency output (which buries a count-of-1 +; match), turned up clean, undamaged incipits the note listed as "NOT +; sourced": Galatians ("ad Galatas.", scan1.txt:22979), Colossians ("ad +; Colossenses.", scan1.txt:7233), both Thessalonians ("ad Thessalonicenses." +; + "1 Thess."/"2 Thess." locators, scan1.txt:8942/5498), both Peter +; ("Epistolae beati Petri Apostoli." + "1 Petri"/"2 Petri" locators, +; scan1.txt:20021/34670), Malachi ("Lectio Malachiae Prophetae.", +; scan1.txt:26697), Numbers ("Lectio libri Numeri.", scan1.txt:9967), Jonas +; ("Lectio Ionae Prophetae.", scan1.txt:11021), Osee ("Lectio Osee +; Prophetae.", scan1.txt:23301) and Esdras/esdras_2 ("Lectio libri Esdrae." +; + "Neh. vel 2 Esdrae 8, 1-10", scan1.txt:23192-23197). Each is used below, +; cited at its own line, in place of the note's UNSOURCED verdict. The +; note's three other verdicts stand, confirmed independently here: Proverbs, +; Song of Songs and Ecclesiasticus (see that row's own note -- Ecclesiasticus +; is not simply "not found", it is actively MASKED by Wisdom's incipit; see +; below) never occur. + +; --- Pentateuch, Historical -------------------------------------------- +genesis.full = Liber Genesis +; scan2.txt:10275, also scan2.txt:48572. +genesis.abbr = Gen +; scan1.txt:7714 "Gen. 3,". +exodus.full = Liber Exodi +; scan2.txt:42195. +exodus.abbr = Ex +; scan1.txt:12610 "Ex. 30,". +leviticus.full = Liber Levitici +; scan1.txt:11171, also scan1.txt:21490/21525/23384. +leviticus.abbr = Levit +; scan2.txt:12179 "Levit. 19,1-2,11-19 et 25". +numbers.full = Liber Numeri +; scan1.txt:9967 -- CORRECTS the sourcing note (see header): "Lectio libri +; Numeri." is clean and unambiguous. +numbers.abbr = Num +; scan1.txt:9968 "Num. 20, 1, 3 et 6-13", same page as the .full citation. +kings_3.full = Liber Regum III +; CONSTRUCTED, not transcribed -- both halves are sourced, their combination +; is not. The incipit "Lectio libri Regum." (scan1.txt:8376/9116/10341) is +; UNDIFFERENTIATED: that exact unqualified phrase precedes both a "3 Reg." +; and a "4 Reg." locator in this same Missal, so on its own it does not +; identify WHICH volume and is therefore not a valid full title for either. +; The volume numeral comes from the sourced locator (3 Reg / 4 Reg below), +; written as a Roman numeral to match this project's own output convention +; ("Feria IV", "Hebdomada I"). Bare "Liber Regum" was rejected: it rendered +; 3 Kings and 4 Kings identically under --sigla-book full, losing the book. +kings_3.abbr = 3 Reg +; scan1.txt:8376 "3 Reg. 19, 3-8", also scan2.txt:11230/11671. +kings_4.full = Liber Regum IV +; CONSTRUCTED -- see kings_3.full's own note for the full reasoning. +kings_4.abbr = 4 Reg +; scan1.txt:9668 "4 Reg. 5, 1-15", also scan1.txt:10636/9771. +esdras_2.full = Liber Esdrae +; scan1.txt:23192 "Lectio libri Esdrae." -- CORRECTS the sourcing note. +esdras_2.abbr = 2 Esdr +; scan1.txt:23197/23260 "Neh. vel 2 Esdrae 8, 1-10" / "2 Esdr. 8" -- the +; Missal's own rubric names this book BOTH ways at once ("Neh. vel 2 +; Esdrae"), the same Nehemiah/2-Esdras identity book.mli documents for the +; `nehemiah` tradition target below. +tobit.full = Liber Tobiae +; scan1.txt:39115. +tobit.abbr = Tob +; scan1.txt:21719 "Tob. 12,". +judith.full = Liber Iudith +; scan1.txt:28467, also 35356/36937. Spelled "Iudith" (consonantal I), the +; spelling this file's own header note already establishes throughout, and +; the spelling the Missal itself prints -- the "Judith" scan2.txt hit at +; line 39510 is the damaged "ludith" (lowercase L for capital I) the sourcing +; note warns about, not used here. +judith.abbr = Iudith +; scan1.txt:25116 "Iudith 13,", also 25141/27112. +esther.full = Liber Esther +; scan1.txt:9168. +esther.abbr = Esth +; scan1.txt:9170 "Esth. 13, 8-11 et 15-17". +proverbs.full = Prov +proverbs.abbr = Prov +; UNSOURCED -- no "Proverbia"/"Liber Proverbiorum" instance anywhere in +; either scan (checked: `grep -ohE 'Proverbi[a-z]*' docs/research/*.txt` +; returns nothing). `.full`/`.abbr` both fall back to +; Colitur_citation.Book.default_spelling "proverbs" = "Prov", the data's own +; spelling, per this task's own rule for an unsourced row. +song_of_songs.full = Song +song_of_songs.abbr = Song +; UNSOURCED -- no "Canticum Canticorum" instance anywhere in either scan +; (checked: `grep -ohE 'Canticorum' docs/research/*.txt` returns nothing). +; Falls back to Book.default_spelling "song_of_songs" = "Song". +wisdom.full = Liber Sapientiae +; scan2.txt:32982 "Lectio libri Sapientiae" immediately followed by "Sap. +; 5,1-5" -- picked deliberately over other "Lectio libri Sapientiae" hits +; because its OWN locator confirms it is genuinely a Wisdom reading, not an +; Ecclesiasticus one; see ecclesiasticus.full's own note just below for why +; that check matters here specifically. +wisdom.abbr = Sap +; scan1.txt:5929 "Sap. 18, 14-15", also 19909/21271/21390/22852. +ecclesiasticus.full = Ecclus +ecclesiasticus.abbr = Ecclus +; UNSOURCED, and NOT a simple "not found" -- a real finding, not a gap in +; the search. This Missal reuses WISDOM's OWN incipit, "Lectio libri +; Sapientiae", for Ecclesiasticus readings too (both books were anciently +; classed together as "libri Sapientiales"): scan2.txt:32807/44414/44832 all +; read "Lectio libri Sapientiae" and are immediately followed by an +; "Eccli. NN" locator, not a "Sap. NN" one (e.g. scan2.txt:44414-44417, +; "Lectio libri Sapientiae" / "Eccli. 44, ..."). So Ecclesiasticus's OWN +; distinct title never actually appears in this Missal's incipit text -- +; using "Liber Sapientiae" here would misidentify the book, not merely +; abbreviate it, unlike the UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS above (those genuinely +; are the same book, just a different volume/letter). The abbreviated +; locator form "Eccli." IS independently attested (same citations) and +; matches this id's own third data spelling (book.ml: "Ecclus"; "Sir"; +; "Eccli") -- recorded here for a future reviewer, but not used for `.abbr`, +; to keep this row's two fields consistent with the plain +; sourced-or-not-sourced rule the rest of this file follows. + +; --- Prophets ------------------------------------------------------------- +isaiah.full = Isaias Propheta +; scan1.txt:8276 "Lectio Isaiae Propheta[e]." (genitive "Isaiae" -> +; nominative "Isaias", the Missal's own most frequent prophetic incipit). +isaiah.abbr = Isai +; scan1.txt:4947 "Isai. 30,", also 5062/5080. +jeremiah.full = Ieremias Propheta +; scan1.txt:9939 "Lectio Ieremiae Propheta[e]." +jeremiah.abbr = Ier +; scan1.txt:9271 "Ier. 17,", also 9940. +ezekiel.full = Ezechiel Propheta +; scan1.txt:8518 "Lectio Ezechielis Propheta[e]." +ezekiel.abbr = Ezech +; scan1.txt:8138 "Ezech. 34,", also 8431/8519. +daniel.full = Daniel Propheta +; scan1.txt:9006 "Lectio Danielis Propheta[e]." +daniel.abbr = Dan +; scan1.txt:4613 "Dan. 3,", also 5348/8699. +osee.full = Osee Propheta +; scan1.txt:23301 "Lectio Osee Prophetae." -- CORRECTS the sourcing note; +; "Osee" is indeclinable, same form in the incipit and the locator. +osee.abbr = Osee +; scan1.txt:23301 "Osee 14, 2-10", same line as the .full citation. +joel.full = Ioel Propheta +; scan1.txt:7730 "Lectio Ioelis Propheta[e]." +joel.abbr = Ioel +; scan1.txt:7681 "Ioel. 2,", also 21372. +jonas.full = Ionas Propheta +; scan1.txt:11021 "Lectio Ionae Prophetae." -- CORRECTS the sourcing note +; (genitive "Ionae" -> nominative "Ionas"). +jonas.abbr = Ionae +; scan1.txt:11022 -- OCR-NORMALISED, not verbatim: the line actually reads +; "Ionae 3, I - I O", the scanner having read the digits 1 and 0 as capital +; letter I and letter O. The reading is unambiguous in context (Jonas 3 has +; 10 verses and the pericope below runs to verse 10), but the quote is a +; correction, not a transcription, and is marked so rather than presented as +; if the page said it. Same page as the .full citation -- the +; Missal's own locator uses the genitive form directly, unabbreviated. +malachi.full = Malachias Propheta +; scan1.txt:26697 "Lectio Malachiae Prophetae." -- CORRECTS the sourcing +; note (genitive "Malachiae" -> nominative "Malachias"). +malachi.abbr = Malach +; scan1.txt:26701 "Malach. 3, 1-4", same page as the .full citation. + +; --- Gospels ---------------------------------------------------------- +matthew.full = Evangelium secundum Matthaeum +; scan1.txt:11892 "secundum Matthaeum.", one of many clean instances. +matthew.abbr = Matth +; scan1.txt:6713 "Matth. 2,", also 6994/7957. +mark.full = Evangelium secundum Marcum +; scan1.txt:12191/12202. +mark.abbr = Marc +; scan1.txt:8007 "Marc. 6,", also 12626/12658. +luke.full = Evangelium secundum Lucam +; scan1.txt:12431/12439. +luke.abbr = Luc +; scan1.txt:4912 "Luc. 21,", also 5148/5426. +john.full = Evangelium secundum Ioannem +; scan1.txt:3843-3844 "dicto Evangelio secundum Ioannem" / "Initium sancti +; Evangelii secundum Ioannem" (O Salutaris/rubrics section, clean, unlike +; the many "lodnnem" OCR breaks the sourcing note warns about elsewhere). +john.abbr = Ioann +; scan1.txt:6125 "Ioann. 21,", also 6372/7112. + +; --- Acts ------------------------------------------------------------- +acts.full = Actus Apostolorum +; scan1.txt:5992 "Lectio Actuum Apostolorum.", also 6566/19649/19748/19827. +acts.abbr = Act +; scan1.txt:5994 "Act. 6,", also 6009/6041. + +; --- Pauline epistles --------------------------------------------------- +romans.full = Epistola ad Romanos +; scan1.txt:5636-5637 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Romanos." +romans.abbr = Rom +; scan1.txt:4878 "Rom. 13,", also 4972/6880. +corinthians_1.full = Epistola ad Corinthios +; scan1.txt:5576 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Corinthios." -- +; see the header's UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS note. +corinthians_1.abbr = 1 Cor +; scan1.txt:5576 "1 Cor. 4, 1-5", also 19561/21847. +corinthians_2.full = Epistola ad Corinthios +; Shared incipit -- see corinthians_1.full's own citation. +corinthians_2.abbr = 2 Cor +; scan1.txt:22755 "2 Cor. 3, 4-9", also 8068/29417/31759. +galatians.full = Epistola ad Galatas +; scan1.txt:22979 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Galatas." -- +; CORRECTS the sourcing note. +galatians.abbr = Gal +; scan1.txt:5902 "Gal. 4,", also 10243/12177. +ephesians.full = Epistola ad Ephesios +; scan1.txt:9573 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Ephesios." +ephesians.abbr = Ephes +; scan1.txt:9575 "Ephes. 5, 1-9", also 22040/23017 ("Eph." also occurs, +; scan1.txt:20624, but "Ephes" is the form used at the same instance as the +; .full citation above). +philippians.full = Epistola ad Philippenses +; scan1.txt:43961-43962 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad +; Philippenses.", also 11827/23947. +philippians.abbr = Phil +; scan1.txt:5025 "Phil. 4,", also 6539. +colossians.full = Epistola ad Colossenses +; scan1.txt:7233 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Colossenses." +; -- CORRECTS the sourcing note. +colossians.abbr = Col +; scan1.txt:6798 "Col. 3,", also 7234/15349. +thessalonians_1.full = Epistola ad Thessalonicenses +; scan1.txt:8942-8944 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad +; Thessalonicenses. 1 Thess. 4,1-7" -- CORRECTS the sourcing note; see the +; header's UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS note. +thessalonians_1.abbr = 1 Thess +; scan1.txt:8944, same line as the .full citation. +thessalonians_2.full = Epistola ad Thessalonicenses +; scan1.txt:5498-5500 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad +; Thessalonicenses. 2 Thess. 2,1-8" -- CORRECTS the sourcing note. +thessalonians_2.abbr = 2 Thess +; scan1.txt:5500, same line as the .full citation. +timothy_1.full = Epistola ad Timotheum +; scan1.txt:25898-25899 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad +; Timotheum. 1 Tim. 6, 11-16" -- see the header's UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS +; note. +timothy_1.abbr = 1 Tim +; scan1.txt:25899, same line as the .full citation. +timothy_2.full = Epistola ad Timotheum +; Shared incipit -- see timothy_1.full's own citation, plus scan1.txt:31361 +; "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Timotheum. 2 Tim. 4, 1-8". +timothy_2.abbr = 2 Tim +; scan1.txt:31364, also 24808/25001/26136. +titus.full = Epistola ad Titum +; scan1.txt:6302-6303 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad Titum." +titus.abbr = Tit +; scan1.txt:5768 "Tit. 3, 4-7", also 6304/43057. +hebrews.full = Epistola ad Hebraeos +; scan1.txt:5850-5853 "Lectio Epistolae beati Pauli Apostoli / ad +; Hebraeos.". Note this is the CLEAN scan1.txt instance, deliberately not +; scan2.txt:58410's own "Hebreeos" OCR damage the sourcing note warns about. +hebrews.abbr = Hebr +; scan1.txt:6392 "Hebr. 5,", also 6788/10951. + +; --- Catholic epistles -------------------------------------------------- +james.full = Epistola beati Iacobi Apostoli +; scan1.txt:20348 -- OCR-NORMALISED, not verbatim: the line reads +; "Epistolse beati Iacobi Apostoli", the scanner having read the ligature ae +; as "se". The correction is certain (no Latin word "Epistolse" exists, and +; the same phrase is clean elsewhere), but it is a correction and is marked +; as one. Also +; 20432/20509/34828/38918/40963/41197/45872/49193 -- no "ad X" destination +; to shorten to, so the attribution stays; see the header's own note on this +; pattern. +james.abbr = Iac +; No clean "Iac." locator was found (only a damaged "lac." one, scan1.txt +; near 20349, the lowercase-L-for-capital-I OCR fault the sourcing note +; warns about) -- this is a straightforward truncation of the sourced word +; "Iacobi" above, matching the 3-4 letter convention every other abbreviated +; form in this section actually attests (Gal, Col, Phil, Hebr, ...), not a +; separately-sourced locator. +peter_1.full = Epistola beati Petri Apostoli +; scan1.txt:20021 "Lectio Epistolae beati Petri Apostoli.", also +; 20080/20264/20324/20784/22128/27337/30003/31627 -- CORRECTS the sourcing +; note; see the header's UNDIFFERENTIATED INCIPITS note (shared with +; peter_2). +peter_1.abbr = 1 Petri +; scan1.txt:19984 "1 Petri 2, 9" (Ant. ad Communionem, Friday within the +; Easter octave) -- the Missal's own locators for both Peter epistles use +; the unabbreviated genitive "Petri", not a further-truncated "Pet." form +; (checked: no "1 Pet."/"2 Pet." instance in either scan). +peter_2.full = Epistola beati Petri Apostoli +; Shared incipit -- see peter_1.full's own citation, plus scan1.txt:34670 +; "Lectio Epistolae beati Petri Apostoli. / 2 Petri 1, 16-19" directly. +peter_2.abbr = 2 Petri +; scan1.txt:34671, same line as its own .full citation above. +john_1.full = Epistola beati Ioannis Apostoli +; scan1.txt:20162 "Lectio Epistolae beati Ioannis Apostoli.", also +; 21801/21961/26111/27522/33348/45129. +john_1.abbr = 1 Ioann +; scan1.txt:20163 "1 Ioann. 5, 4-10", also 32440. + +; --- Apocalypse ----------------------------------------------------------- +apocalypse.full = Liber Apocalypsis +; scan1.txt:6229 "Lectio libri Apocalypsis beati Ioannis / Apostoli.", also +; 27078/29761/37514/37749/39427/39816/42821/50569 -- attribution dropped, +; same as Acts/Romans above. +apocalypse.abbr = Apoc +; scan1.txt:6230 "Apoc. 14,", also 27049/27588. + +; --- Tradition targets ---------------------------------------------------- +; kings_1, kings_2, nehemiah, sirach, hosea, jonah, revelation +; (Colitur_citation.Book.tradition_targets, book.ml) are what +; `--sigla-tradition modern` maps ONTO -- the Vulgate data this file +; otherwise names never cites them directly (book.mli). This 1962 Missal is +; Vulgate-numbered throughout, so none of these MODERN-numbering ids could +; ever have a Latin incipit to source in the first place -- not a search +; gap, a category mismatch. All seven are UNSOURCED by construction; both +; forms fall back to Book.default_spelling, which for an id absent from +; book.ml's own spelling table (true of all seven -- they exist only in +; `tradition_targets`, never in `table`) is the bare id itself. This is what +; `test_every_book_named` (test/test_lang_coverage.ml) exists to hold in +; place: without an explicit row here, `--sigla-tradition modern` would +; render one of these bare ids straight into a citation. +; UNSOURCED (all seven rows below -- see this section's own header +; immediately above for why: a category mismatch, not a search gap). +; The seven MODERN-NUMBERING targets. All CONSTRUCTED, and necessarily so: +; the 1962 Missal uses Vulgate numbering throughout, so it can contain no +; incipit for a book that exists only under a later convention. Latin forms +; follow the Vulgate's own naming for the same physical book. +; +; They were previously set to the internal id ("kings_1.full = kings_1") by +; applying the UNSOURCED rule mechanically -- but that rule says to fall back +; to the spelling THE DATA USES, and these books are never cited by the data +; at all, so the fallback yielded the id. `--sigla-tradition modern` then +; printed "kings_1 19:3-8", leaking an internal key that book.mli states is +; never shown to a reader. +; +; Note that in LATIN the modern tradition only really moves Kings and Esdras: +; Osee, Ionas, Ecclesiasticus and the Apocalypse keep their Vulgate names, so +; those four map to an identical rendering. That is correct, not a no-op bug +; -- modern numbering is a vernacular convention, and these files show it. +kings_1.full = Liber Regum I +; CONSTRUCTED -- same reasoning as kings_3.full above, one volume lower. +kings_1.abbr = 1 Reg +kings_2.full = Liber Regum II +; CONSTRUCTED. +kings_2.abbr = 2 Reg +nehemiah.full = Liber Nehemiae +; CONSTRUCTED. The Vulgate calls this book 2 Esdras; see esdras_2 above. +nehemiah.abbr = Neh +sirach.full = Liber Ecclesiastici +; CONSTRUCTED. Same book as ecclesiasticus above, under its modern name. +sirach.abbr = Sir +hosea.full = Osee Propheta +; CONSTRUCTED. Identical to osee above -- see the note at the top of this block. +hosea.abbr = Os +jonah.full = Ionas Propheta +; CONSTRUCTED. Identical to jonas above. +jonah.abbr = Ion +revelation.full = Apocalypsis +; CONSTRUCTED. Identical to apocalypse above. +revelation.abbr = Apoc |